The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Business

October 30, 2012

US appeals court rejects Argentine bond arguments

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — Argentina lost its long battle against bond holdouts in the U.S. courts Friday when an appellate panel rejected every argument it made against paying $1.33 billion to investors who refused to accept as little as 25 cents on the dollar for the country’s defaulted debt in 2005.

The U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York rejected a dozen appeals filed by Argentina over the years, and ordered the South American country to pay the holdouts an equal amount whenever it makes payments on other debt that has been restructured since the country’s economic collapse a decade ago.

“We hold that Argentina breached its promise,” the appellate court said, summarizing a 29-page ruling that could make it difficult for Argentina to use the U.S. financial system to make other debt payments unless it complies.

The ruling effectively gives Argentina a stark choice: Either pay all bondholders equally, or pay none of them.

A spokeswoman at Argentina’s Economy Ministry said the government had no immediate comment on the ruling.

NML Capital Ltd., the investment fund that brought the case, referred questions to its parent company, billionaire Paul Singer’s Elliott Capital Management fund, whose spokesman Peter Truell has declined to comment publicly.

Prices for Argentine bonds of all kinds sank after the ruling, especially debt paid in dollars. That increases borrowing costs for the country’s national and provincial governments, which are already much higher than other nations because existing Argentine debt is rated far below investment grade.    

The Argentine government argued that forcing it to pay the holdouts could provoke another severe economic crisis in Argentina, but the appellate court said that “nothing in the record supports Argentina’s blanket assertion.” It agreed with U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa, who ruled that with more than $40 billion in foreign reserves, Argentina can afford to pay.

Argentina also argued that U.S. law makes its assets immune from seizure as collateral. It got support on this point from the U.S. government, which warned the courts that ruling in favor of a single creditor could complicate U.S. foreign policy in ways that go far beyond relations with Argentina. Banks also warned against creating expensive bottlenecks in the U.S. financial system’s clearinghouse for bond payments.

But the judges dismissed these concerns, noting that laws imposed since Argentina’s default now effectively prevent would-be holdouts from opting out of debt restructurings, and that if Argentina pays up as ordered, no more assets would be seized.  

Economist Arturo Porzecanski at American University in Washington called the ruling “a watershed legal event.”

“This decision has driven a stake through the heart of Argentina’s legal and political strategy of refusing to pay the holdouts while paying all other bondholders,” said Porzecanski, who served as an expert witness for plaintiffs in a separate case involving unpaid Argentine debts.

Argentina argued that the holdouts bought the bonds at rock-bottom prices during the country’s 2002 default fully knowing that they might not get repaid, but the judges said Argentina made promises when it issued the debt in the 1990s and must keep them.

The judges also said NML Capital and other holdouts legitimately invoked “acceleration” clauses that raise the total to $1.33 billion in unpaid principal and interest.

One point bothered the appellate court: Griesa said any financial institution that processes Argentina’s payments to the holders of restructured bonds would be violating the court’s order if it didn’t ensure that the holdouts are simultaneously paid an equal amount. This could force U.S. banks to stop accepting Argentina’s money unless the government complies. The appellate court asked for more clarity on how this would work.

“The judge will come up with some minor changes,” Porzecanski predicted. “But he basically got the green light to find a practical solution to what seemed an intractable problem.”

Argentina can appeal to the full 2nd Circuit appeals court, and then to the U.S. Supreme Court. But meanwhile it has debts to pay, and the immediate impact of the ruling is to make them much more expensive.

“If the government of Argentina were a sensible player in the international financial arena, if it were a predictable debtor, it would not have major consequences, because Argentina can certainly pay these bondholders in full, from one day to the next,” Porzecanski said. “But if you were an investor in new bonds or previously restructured bonds, you have to mark them down for a greater possibility of default.”

He cited Argentine President Cristina Fernandez’s refusal this week to post $20 million with a court in Ghana to release the Argentine navy’s signature tall ship from a port where NML Capital managed to have it detained as collateral for the unpaid debts. She said she would rather leave the ship docked in Africa for as long as she’s president, than negotiate with the “vulture funds” or “fondos buitre,” as she labels the holdouts.

“That’s nothing compared to what they owe in this case,” he said. “She might just come out and say, ‘No, I’m not going to pay the regularized bondholders if it means paying the ‘fondos buitre’.”

The risk has increased that he next time an interest payment is due to current bankholders, they might say no.

 

1
Text Only
Business
  • Business US stocks close higher for third day in a row

    Investors drove stock prices to their highest level in a week Wednesday,

    April 16, 2014 1 Photo

  • China’s growth slows to 7.4 percent in 1Q

    China’s economic growth slowed further in the latest quarter but appeared strong enough to satisfy Chinese leaders who are trying to put the country on a more sustainable path without politically dangerous job losses.

    April 16, 2014

  • A look at 3 minority business mentoring programs

    A look at minority business mentoring programs, called accelerators, in three metropolitan areas.

    April 16, 2014

  • Why high oil prices are actually good for airlines

    Airline executives frequently complain about fuel costs. But the truth is higher prices actually have been good for business.

    April 16, 2014

  • Business US stocks open higher; Yahoo soars in early trade

    U.S. stocks moved higher in early trading on Wednesday, extending their gains into a third day. Investors welcomed solid earnings from Yahoo as well as some encouraging news about China’s economy and U.S. factory production.

    April 16, 2014 1 Photo

  • Detroit strikes second deal with its other retirees

    The city of Detroit reached tentative agreements to preserve pensions for retired police office and firefighters but cut monthly payments for other former employees, key deals that could accelerate the largest public bankruptcy in U.S. history, officials said Tuesday.

    April 16, 2014

  • Missouri court expands legal rights for injured workers

    The Missouri Supreme Court has overturned 30 years of precedent with a ruling that gives greater legal protections to injured workers who are fired from their jobs.

    April 15, 2014

  • Immigration activists urge Obama to act boldly

    Latinos and immigration activists are warning of political peril for President Barack Obama and Democrats in the fall election unless the president acts boldly and soon to curb deportations and allow more immigrants to remain legally in the U.S.

    April 15, 2014

  • Farmers off to slow start planting corn crop

    Spring planting across the nation’s Corn Belt is sputtering because the soil remains too soggy or cold for effective seeding.

    April 15, 2014

  • Schreiber Foods schedules Carthage plant expansion

    Plans to expand a Schreiber Foods plant to eventually add 160 new jobs have been endorsed by a Carthage committee working with the company. Andrew Tobish, director of combinations for Schreiber, which is based in Green Bay, Wis., confirmed the project, which he said would be complete by late spring or early summer in 2015.

    April 15, 2014

Poll

The Supreme Court may take up a challenge to an Ohio law that bars false statements about political candidates during a campaign. Do you think false accusations made in the heat of an election should be punished as a crime?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
NDN Video
Disbanding Muslim Surveillance Draws Praise Hundreds Missing After South Korean Ferry Sinks Passengers Abuzz After Plane Hits Swarm of Bees Boston Bomb Scare Defendant Appears in Court Pistorius Trial: Adjourned Until May 5 Diaz Gets Physical for New Comedy Raw: Ferry Sinks Off South Korean Coast Town, Victims Remember Texas Blast Freeze Leaves Florida Panhandle With Dead Trees At Boston Marathon, a Chance to Finally Finish Are School Dress Codes Too Strict? Raw: Fatal Ferry Boat Accident Suspicious Bags Found Near Marathon Finish Line Boston Marks the 1st Anniversary of Bombing NYPD Ends Muslim Surveillance Program 8-year-old Boy Gets His Wish: Fly Like Iron Man Sex Offenders Arrested in Slayings of CA Women India's Transgenders Celebrate Historic Ruling Tributes Mark Boston Bombing Anniversary Raw: Kan. Shooting Suspect Faces Judge