The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 22, 2013

Bruce Speck, guest columnist: Change in statute good for university

JOPLIN, Mo. — Recently, Senate Bill 67, sponsored by Sen. David Pearce, of Warrensburg, has attracted attention regarding a component of Missouri Southern State University’s mission. I’d like to address the proposed changes noted in that bill and to discuss why I believe this change is good for the university.

From a historical standpoint, Missouri Southern began supporting an international approach to education in 1989 because it recognized the need to prepare students for careers in an increasingly global society. The international component to the university’s mission then became legislation in 1995.

While I am supportive of international opportunities for our students, I have been concerned with the limitations that accompany a university’s mission being inscribed in legislation. For nearly two decades, only five of the 13 Missouri state colleges and universities have had their missions tied to state legislation. Instead, the normal procedure is to have missions in the Rules of the Coordinating Board for Higher Education.

Having missions stated in the Rules of the CBHE, rather than in a statute, provides a university with more flexibility for future direction because changes do not require legislative approval. We don’t know how the world will continue to change and what our students will need decades from now.

I believe part of the confusion around this issue centers on how to define the role of “international” in our mission. Our mission is clearly stated within our strategic plan, and defines Missouri Southern as a “state-supported, comprehensive university offering programs leading to undergraduate and graduate degrees. Central to our mission is a strong commitment to international education, liberal arts, professional and pre-professional programs, and the complementary relationship that must exist among them to prepare individuals for success in careers and lifelong learning.”

This language was developed and approved through the strategic planning process that included broad participation by constituents from across campus.

Our mission cannot be confined or defined by the term “international.”

International is, however, an important component of our mission. What we have done to internationalize the campus for students is commendable; our themed semester every fall is extraordinary, particularly because no other institution in the nation has such a program, and because it helps bring the world to the campus for students who choose not to study abroad. I have no intention of eliminating the international component of our mission. I support it.

On a personal note, my wife and I have encouraged all three of our children to engage in international travel and we have funded much of that travel. Our son’s undergraduate degree is in international studies, and his overseas experiences have expanded the knowledge he gained in that program. Both our daughters taught in Saudi Arabia, and we were excited they could have that experience.

The important thing to note is that removing Missouri Southern’s mission from state statute does not change our mission. If we were to change our mission, I would facilitate a campuswide discussion, because that would truly have the potential to influence the direction of the university.

A change in statute will not affect funding or change our status as a statewide university, and it will have no impact on the day-to-day operation of Missouri Southern. Students will continue to have the opportunity to study abroad, engage in the themed semesters, and interact on campus with students from other parts of the world.

Providing students with insights into the world is a critical part of higher education, and we will continue to prepare our students for success in careers and in lifelong learning.

Bruce Speck is the president of Missouri Southern State University.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN
Sports