In 2006, Missouri courts recognized that requiring voters to provide photo identification before they can vote violates the state’s constitution.
The court’s message clear: A law like this would create barriers at the polls for some senior citizens, college students, poor people and some people with disabilities.
Why? Because they make up the nearly 230,000 voters in our state who do not possess driver’s licenses, one of the easiest and most-often used forms of photo identification.
The measure is back, and in our view it does more to disenfranchise voters than it does to protect them. The Missouri House on Wednesday approved legislation that would require voters to show government-issued photo ID before they could cast a ballot. The House version of the legislation also allows voters to cast ballots before Election Day in statewide elections. The House passed the legislation 99-52 Wednesday, returning it to the Senate.
In order to get around the constitutional question, the measure is also linked to a proposed constitutional amendment that would authorize voter ID and advanced voting laws. That constitutional amendment would appear on the 2012 statewide ballot, if it receives final approval from lawmakers before their session ends May 13.
If those supporting voter ID were able to produce an example of voter fraud in Missouri, then we might agree that there’s reason to adopt the law and go to the lengths and expense to hold an election and change our constitution.
Do our voting rolls need to be updated so as to avoid voting irregularities? Absolutely. But that has nothing to do with producing a photo before you can vote.
We would urge Missouri senators to turn down this bill, keeping in mind whom it really affects — their constituents.
Opinion
Our view: Creating a problem
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Victims should come first
Millions of dollars in donations have poured in from around the world since the May 22, 2011, tornado. Those donations represent money from lemonade stands, charity auctions, corporate gifts and celebrity checks, just to name a few. In fact, one year later donations continue to come to Joplin.
-
Beth Meeker, guest columnist: Same-sex marriage battle a quest for equal rights
I would like to take a moment to reply to guest columnist Anson Burlingame’s, “The Marriage Debate” (Globe, May 13).
-
Sunday Forum: 2012 graduation speakers key on tornado, mall school and president’s visit
Editor’s note: In addition to speeches by President Barack Obama and Gov. Jay Nixon, Joplin High School’s top students addressed graduates, faculty, parents and other guests packed into the Leggett & Platt Athletic Center on the Missouri Southern State University campus. Following are the text of those speeches.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Pack mentality takes truth as a casualty
President Obama’s Joplin graduation speech Monday showed that while there’s the political “right,” there’s also a very active “rabid” political right.
-
Your View: ‘Study’ can mean anything
A few evenings ago, I watched a television program on the science of marriage.
-
Our View: Support for museum
How can you tell the story of Joplin without the accounts of its mining history?
-
Our View: Finding middle ground
The G-8 summit held last week in Camp David ended as expected.
-
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Class of 2012 upholds character, hope
My oldest granddaughter was part of the class of 2012 from Joplin High School, and I attended the ceremony on Monday night.
-
Scott Charton, guest columnist: 'Deadline in Disaster' film a story about storytellers
Local newspapers are at their best when they help their communities confront, understand, endure and overcome shared challenges.
-
Our View: Make voting easiser
This year’s ballot will not include a proposed constitutional amendment that photo identification be required at the polls in Missouri. Good.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Our View: Victims should come first


