The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

January 9, 2014

Other Views: Good for thee, not me

JOPLIN, Mo. — It seems the get-the-government-off-our-backs crowd in Topeka has decided that it’s OK to penalize some of those receiving state aid if they fail a drug test, but legislators don’t believe the rule should apply to them.

According to a story in The Topeka Capital-Journal, under a new state law, low-income Kansans who fail their drug test will have their benefits frozen unless they complete a treatment program.

Not so for legislators. And because of privacy laws, it’s not clear that the names of legislators who fail the test can be released.

The Kansas bill also bars anyone convicted of a drug-related felony from receiving cash aid for five years and extends that to a lifetime ban for a second conviction. It also requires drug screening for recipients of unemployment insurance.

Rep. Stephanie Clayton, R-Overland Park, told the Topeka newspaper: “The only reason I voted for that bill is because I knew legislators would be tested. I just assumed that if we were subject to testing, we were subject to the same treatment as the individuals we imposed this on. Obviously we’re not.”

Clayton would like to see legislators who fail the test forfeit their legislative pay and have to go into rehab.

Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, sought to not only have legislators tested but also the heads of businesses that received state incentives. The effort to test business leaders failed, as did his effort to penalize legislators who failed a test.

The positive side of testing is that if the state knows who has a drug problem, it can help by getting those people into treatment.

But we’re also sure some legislators saw this as a chance to cut off drug users who they fear are living off the dole.

We like the idea of expanding treatment, but cutting off aid can punish far more than just the drug user. Quite often children and other dependents are involved.

A better, long-term solution would be to move toward legalizing drugs. But until then, we’ll settle for at least not punishing those who have a drug problem, and that would include legislators.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

A new provision by the U.S. Department of Agriculture allows qualifying districts with high percentages of students on food assistance to allow all students to eat free breakfasts and lunches. Would you agree with this provision?

Yes
No
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Palestinians and Israeli Soldiers Clash Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kerry: No Deal Yet on 7-Day Gaza Truce Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Gaza Residents Mourn Dead Amid Airstrikes Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp Cumberbatch Brings 'Penguins' to Comic-Con Raw: Air Algerie Crash Site in Mali Power to Be Restored After Wash. Wildfire Crashed Air Algerie Plane Found in Mali Israel Mulls Ceasefire Amid Gaza Offensive
Sports