The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


October 11, 2012

Our View: Polls don’t vote for presidents

In our view, polls are like oddsmaker predictions for football games. They can swing in an instant one way or another.

A week before the first presidential debate, the Pew Poll, one that is generally respected for fairness, showed President Barack Obama leading former Gov. Mitt Romney 51 percent to 43 percent. A couple of days after that first debate, the results were Romney leading Obama 49 percent to 45 percent, a swing of 12 percentage points.

Were either of the two polls inaccurate, or in fact did American public opinion swing by 12 percent or so in a week? That would reflect a change in voter opinion of over 14 million potential voters come Nov. 6. That is a huge amount of votes if it takes only about 60 million favorable votes to win the election.

As well, we are being told by national media sources that the presidential election will be decided only in “battleground” states like Ohio, Virginia, Florida, etc. We suppose then, if you believe everything you hear, our votes in Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma mean little or nothing, right?

Our point is simple. Why would any responsible voter cast a ballot as a result of the influence from polls?

Our individual votes should be the results of careful individual decisions taking into account the confidence in the future leadership, the ability of a candidate to make the correct decisions in the future and get others to follow his lead. We need a president who will help all Americans, not just various groups of Americans.

Voters should not be mobs urged on by sound bites, vague and questionable promises or mass opinion that swings all the time, at the drop of a hat so to speak in today’s world of instant communications. Our future prosperity and protection in America will turn on effective leadership from a president to a great degree.

Great leaders are not made by polls. They are created by long experience, courage and a keen sense of what is right to do.

Text Only
  • Other Views Other Views: Time for special inquiry

    Testifying at a House committee hearing recently, Internal Revenue Services Commissioner John Koskinen did nothing to enlighten Congress or the public about a year-old scandal about whether his agency improperly targeted conservative groups.

    July 10, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Roundabout education

    With an influx of new roundabouts in Joplin, someone needs to promote education on how to drive through one. For instance, what yield means, stay in your lane, slow down, etc.

    July 10, 2014

  • Your View: How tragic

    “Governor vetoes 72-hour wait” was the headline on the front page of the July 3 Globe.

    July 10, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Restore the hall

    To borrow a phrase from a Home Depot commercial: “Let’s start doing.”

    July 9, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: It's like stepping into the Twilight Zone

    U.S. Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., was visiting the Fort Sill military complex in his home state and decided to visit the illegal immigrant processing center the federal government had recently opened on base.

    July 9, 2014

  • Your View: Who’s to blame?

    Not long ago, Mercy cut area jobs because our Republican legislators have refused Medicaid expansion.

    July 8, 2014

  • Your View: Access to health care

    On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against an Affordable Care Act requirement that employers cover certain contraceptive products at no extra charge, as part of preventive benefits in employee health insurance plans.

    July 8, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Who’s calling the shots?

    If Missouri Farmers Care really does care about the “Right to Farm” amendment on the Aug. 5 ballot, it sure has an odd way of showing it.

    July 8, 2014 1 Photo

  • Darvin Bentlage, guest columnist: Big ag dream wrong for Missouri farmers

    For centuries, we have had the right to farm. On Tuesday, Aug. 5, a proposed constitutional amendment will be on the state ballot that is supposed to give us protection so we can have the “Right to Farm.”

    July 7, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Restrained ruling

    As most of the country was focused this past week on the Supreme Court ruling on whether Obamacare can force Hobby Lobby to provide contraceptive insurance coverage to its employees (it can’t), the high court released an opinion on another major case.

    July 7, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster is supporting an August ballot measure that would insert the right to farm into the state constitution. The governor is leaning toward opposing it. Do you support the Freedom to Farm amendment?

     View Results
NDN Video
FIFA Rejects Suarez Appeal Against Biting Ban World Cup Final Pits Argentina Against Germany Obama Responds to Hecklers on Immigration Chimp-attack Victim Lobbies Congress Police: Prostitute Linked to 2nd Death Thousands Attend NYC Firefighter's Funeral Neighbors Mourn Killing of Texas Family Art of Haitian Machete Fighting Revived Israeli-Palestinian Tensions, Attacks Escalate UN Secretary-General Urges Mideast Ceasefire 'Game of Thrones' Leads Emmy Nominees Raw: Australia Hosts Annual Beer Can Regatta At Texas Border, a Daily Tide of Poor Migrants Raw: Rescuers Push Beached Whale Back to Ocean Mass. Mayor: Families Lost Everything in Fire Four Kids, Two Adults Shot Dead Near Houston Connecticut Boy Dies Inside Parked Car Fans Dying to Be Near Jazz Greats Robots Gearing Up for Their Own 'World Cup'