The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


July 1, 2013

Your View: Government should leave marriage alone

WEBB CITY, Mo. — I am continually amazed and baffled by the fearful, often downright apocalyptic comments coming from opponents of gay marriage.

But, religion aside, I have yet to hear one truly objective and logical argument against it.

For example, Phillip Cosby stated in the Globe story “Rulings favor gay marriage” (June 27) that “It (gay marriage) will disassemble the family unit. The consequences I think will be devastating.”

Exactly how will the millions of heterosexual families in this country be “disassembled”?  

The divorce rate is already 50 percent among those marriages.

Giving the legal rights of marriage to same sex couples won’t affect that one way or the other.  

I would like to know exactly what devastating consequences Mr. Cosby foresees.

In that same story John Putnam thinks Congress, not the Supreme Court, should define marriage.

Given the appalling performance of Congress over the last few years, to say nothing of the outrageously ignorant statements spouted in the name of science and wisdom, this seems horrifyingly inappropriate.

In my view, government has no business telling people whom they can marry. Marriage laws should deal with questions of property and money, and other legalities.

If a particular church wants to refuse to unite same sex couples on religious grounds, that is its prerogative. (You may have noticed that many churches have welcomed same sex couples into the fold.)

Another argument brought forth is that marriage is about procreation.

How does same sex marriage change that?

Many heterosexual couples do not have children. And many same-sex couples do, often adopting children in need of a family.

There is solid evidence all around us of same sex couples in committed life-long relationships, raising children in stable, loving homes, contributing positively to America’s society at every level of endeavor.

In a country founded on the rule of law (not religion), why should they not be equal under that law, as our Constitution mandates?

In the meantime, heterosexual couples will continue to marry, procreate, and go about the business of living as they have for centuries.

As successful as it is, Western Civilization may someday fade away. But I seriously doubt that same-sex marriage will be the cause.

Gwen Hunt

Webb City

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating