The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


December 26, 2012

Our View: EBV case raises concerns

JOPLIN, Mo. — A “significant” settlement in the wake of “substantial” emissions. So said a spokesman for the Environmental Protection Agency, summing up pollution discharges from EBV Explosives Environmental Co., as well as subsequent EPA enforcement efforts.

“Concerning” is another descriptor we will add to the mix after the federal agency announced the plant between Joplin and Carthage had excess hydrogen chloride and chlorine gas emissions, and would install equipment to eliminate 200,000 pounds of pollution annually.

Besides agreeing to install additional equipment to cut emissions, the company also agreed to a settlement of more than $580,000.

We’re pleased the plant has cut pollution. What’s concerning is the way the thing came to light.

Federal and state regulators in recent years have lacked the resources, and sometimes the will, to closely monitor emissions into the environment. So companies are required to monitor their own pollution discharges and self-report when there are violations.

“The report starts a process of enforcement, and when we looked further into it, we found violations of their permit,” said the EPA’s Chris Whitley.

Hazardous waste, primarily from outdated military munitions, has been burned in the incinerator since 1995. In 2008, the company announced it was expanding to handle two new waste streams under a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense. But company officials at the time said the new units they were building to process the waste would be “10 times more effective in controlling emissions” than earlier methods.

Bill Michaels, a former Carthage veterinarian, was among those who opposed the original incinerator in the late 1980s. He said residents should be concerned about anything that put more lead and other pollutants into the environment and that the public must “keep on top of this to make sure the company is doing what it says it’s going to do.”

Somebody needs to make sure companies keep their environmental pledges, but we’re not sure that putting that responsibility on the shoulders of the public — or self-reporting by the company —  is an answer that gives us confidence.


Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins