JOPLIN, Mo. —
On Jan. 1, Congress voted to avoid going over the “fiscal cliff” by raising taxes on the “rich” (now defined as a family making over $450,000).
In doing so, tax increases on essentially all other Americans — about 99 percent of us — were avoided. A “no” vote by any senator or representative was essentially a vote for the largest tax increase in American history.
So, why did some members of Congress vote “no” on the bill when it was put before Congress on New Year’s Day?
I don’t know the answer, but I do know that 7th District Rep. Billy Long did exactly that. He voted “no.”
By the time the bill came to a vote in the House at about 11 p.m. Tuesday, the outcome was fairly certain that the bill would pass, largely because almost all Democrats voted in favor of the bill. Republicans voted almost 2 to 1 against the bill. But it was a safe vote in that even by saying “no,” the actual consequences of a huge tax increase were going to be averted.
So, Billy Long was able to use his vote to show allegiance to his no-new-taxes tea party faction without causing grave impact on those he represents. I suppose that is good politics.
However, in terms of governing for the good of all Americans, it was the wrong vote, in my view.
There’s no doubt he will have good reasons, and I can imagine the spin he’ll apply if he chooses to respond to this public challenge. He’ll probably point to the fact that the legislation raised taxes $41 for every $1 in proposed spending cuts — that is not a balanced approach to putting the federal government on firm financial footing. For that to happen, along with some tax increases spending must come down.
President Obama and the Democrats clearly put the GOP in a box on Jan. 1. But Billy Long remained true to the box, as demanded by the tea party. By voting as he did, he essentially voted to raise taxes on everyone in America. He remained true to his principles in one case by demanding only spending cuts to reduce the deficit, but also voted for a huge tax increase with his “no” vote. I see no way he can wiggle his way off of that hook, planted by those wily Democrats. In short, Billy Long and the tea party got out-politicked, but they will never admit it, I suppose.
The other huge political feat achieved by President Obama and Vice President Biden was their long-sought goal of splitting the GOP vote in the House. They got Republicans to fight with other Republicans, while Democrats accepted a compromise and voted as a solid bloc in the House.
I think the strategic term used in such cases is “divide and conquer,” which clearly happened in the House of Representatives on Jan. 1. The vote also reflects the continuing and substantial division inside the GOP.
All votes in Congress are important, but a vote in isolation must be one that promotes good government for we the people.
A huge tax increase is not a good vote. I challenge Long to explain why his vote was a good vote for all Americans.
Anson Burlingame lives in Joplin.
Opinion
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Long out-politicked by Democratic Party
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Connecting the town
Well before the 2011 tornado, Joplin had a problem with “connectivity.” That’s right. The flow of traffic — whether it be cars, pedestrians or bicyclists — has been a sore spot with us for years.
-
Other Views: Debt of honor
In Afghanistan, the Taliban have promised to kill Afghans who worked for the Americans and their families. In Iraq, similar threats were made by radical Islamic insurgents.
-
Your View: Bold leadership needed
Dear City Council Members, Let me first thank you for your service to our community.
-
Carol Stark: Dad took us on ‘travels’ that lasted a lifetime
This isn’t the column I had planned on writing, but it’s the one that keeps running through my mind. And so does this question: How do I cope on my first Father’s Day without my dad?
-
Herb Van Fleet, guest columnist: Big Brother is always watching and listening
Sen. Church made that statement 38 years ago. He chaired a committee that was formed to develop legislation to rein in the CIA, FBI, NSA and other intelligence agencies, which had been operating outside the bounds of the law, including the Constitution.
-
Geoff Caldwell, guest columnist: Jury still out on whistle-blower’s actions
Whether you see Edward Snowden as a hero, a traitor or something in between, there is no denying that the admitted “leaker” has opened up an industrial-size can of National Security Agency worms.
-
Trish Patton, guest columnist: Downtown group needs stakeholders' support
On Tuesday the Downtown Joplin Alliance (DJA) tabled the Community Improvement District (CID) initiative.
-
Our View: Earning a new badge
The Girl Scouts of the Missouri Heartland made a good decision Friday when it voted to give the community until November to develop a long-term plan to keep Camp Mintahama open.
-
Other Views: Stop farm bill gridlock
With a hopeful sound of gridlock cracking, U.S. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Wednesday that he will vote for the House farm bill even though he has “concerns.” He reasons that “doing nothing means we get no changes in the nutrition programs.”
-
Marta Mossburg, columnist: Liberalism worldview doesn't make sense
The high priests of liberalism must be tossing and turning in their organic cotton bedding and downing more small-batch artisan whisky each night trying to cope with the abject failure of their cause
- More Opinion Headlines
-



