The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

January 21, 2013

Marta Mossburg, columnist: Dark side of jihad still a threat to U.S.

— We have come a long way since Sept. 11, 2001. We fought two wars ostensibly to protect freedom at home for Americans, promote it in two countries and to make the world safer — and achieved none of those goals.

A few examples: In the United States, officials blamed an anti-Muslim video for killing Libyan Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others, not al-Qaida linked terrorists as evidence immediately made clear. He was the first U.S. ambassador killed in office since 1979. The noose of political correctness prevents government officials from labeling the 13 murders of people at Fort Hood in Texas by Maj. Nidal Hasan an act of terror. Witnesses to the slaughter said Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” (“God is Great!”) before opening fire. The Obama administration classifies the assault as “workplace violence.”

And those who point out acts of Islamic extremism, as Pamela Geller has in transit ads across the country quoting the Quran and terrorists’ definitions of jihad, are labeled “racist.” Geller, author of “Stop the Islamization of America,” is no stranger to controversy. She is known primarily for her opposition to the ground zero mosque and for her transit ads. A sample: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.”

Jarring, yes. But should she have had to sue the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority and other cities to run them? Isn’t this America?

And then there is the Patriot Act, passed six weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, which makes it much easier for the government to spy on citizens.

Thousands of U.S. troops have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, only to have Islamic law largely govern those lands. Osama bin Laden, 9/11 mastermind, may be dead, but al-Qaida has not gone away. Afghanistan remains one of the most hostile countries for women. Girls are forced into plural marriages. Women are killed for “honor” and frequently raped with impunity.

In response to Afghan troops murdering U.S. soldiers, the Pentagon ordered Islamic sensitivity training. Among the rules: Soldiers must not show the bottom of their boots when sitting across from a Muslim, blow their nose or offer or accept anything with their left hand, as if violating any of those codes deserves death. Remind me, why we are over there again?

Meanwhile, Americans across the country are treated to ads by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an influential Muslim advocacy group, declaring jihad as American as apple pie.

The ads, launched in Chicago in December and soon to be seen on buses and trains across the country, mainly feature young women. They include, “My jihad is to not judge people by their cover,” “My jihad is to build friendships across the aisle,” and “My jihad is to always pursue new ideas and conquer new challenges.” Personally I think the ads would have a lot more credibility if they instead said, “My jihad is ensuring that no one is jailed in Iran for being a Christian,” or “My jihad is lobbying the Saudi Arabian government so that women can drive,” or “My jihad is preventing honor killings in Afghanistan.”

But as shown by the millions of Muslims who live peacefully in the United States, the ads above ring true. That does not mean, however, Americans should be labeled racists for talking about the darker side of jihad practiced by al-Qaida and others who wish to annihilate Americans.

CAIR can call Geller’s ads “hate speech” and say what it wants. The First Amendment protects its speech. But Geller should also have the right to speak her mind without having to sue to gain access to public billboards, which are constantly defaced. It is in everybody’s best interest.

America does not need any more mosques burned as in Joplin, Mo., Murfreesboro, Tenn., and Toledo, Ohio, or more Americans killed overseas. Silence — through political correctness or fear — only gives those who commit terror at home and abroad a stronger voice.

 

Marta H. Mossburg writes about national affairs and politics in Maryland, where she lives. Read her at www.martamossburg.com. Write her at marta@martamossburg.com.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US
Sports