Let’s see if we’ve got this right.
The people who make the rules for the rest of us in the state don’t have to abide by those same rules in their offices. Is that it?
It’s hard to interpret it any other way, based on votes in the Missouri House of Representatives last week that determined members can continue to smoke in their House offices.
A majority of Missouri House members, including those in the Joplin-area delegation, voted to reject a proposal to ban smoking in member offices. Another proposal to leave smoking policy to the decision of the caucuses passed.
The votes come despite a smoking ban in place in all state buildings, except for prisons, and all public areas of the Capitol.
So only prisoners and legislators can smoke. Draw your own conclusions.
The vote also means that legislators are thumbing their noses at restrictions in place in Jefferson City for two years after residents there voted in November 2010 to ban smoking in bars, restaurants and other indoor workplaces.
These are the same members who talk about the importance of decisions made at the local government level, and who say rules should prevail.
It’s not the first time in this short session that some members have sent the message that obeying the law can be selective — another member has proposed a bill that would exempt the state from any federal gun control regulations that are imposed by executive order or by Congress.
Pro-smoking arguments cited by the majority were that members worked long hours and erratic schedules and should be able to smoke in offices, and that productivity would be reduced when members who smoked had to leave their offices to light up. There are other staffers in the Capitol who also work long hours, but they don’t get a smoke break.
It reminds us of the Charlie Brown cartoon when the teacher or parents are talking and all that comes back is an unintelligible “WA WA WA.”
We hear what they’re saying.
But what it really sounds like is: “We make the rules. But they don’t apply to us.”
Let’s see if we’ve got this right.
Our View: MDC’s got it right
You might be surprised to learn that one of Missouri’s most robust volunteer programs is run by the government.
Other Views: Ex-inmate deserves justice
July 15 was a great day for Mark Woodworth, who learned that the murder charge that wrongly sent him to prison for 17 years had finally been dismissed.
Your View: Confusing the facts
I have found during my time in public service if someone is on the wrong side of an issue, the best they can do is attempt to confuse the public with statements that do not reflect the facts.
Your View: Too many TIFs
Every Joplin taxpayer wants good, sound development in the city.
Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Civility is in eye of beholder (or attacker)
From week to week, what generates this column is pretty much the same: weekend coffee, the news of the day and a topics list.
Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years
Does anyone recall the major economic argument during the 2000 presidential campaign between George Bush and Al Gore?
Our View: Lone holdout
Missouri continues to be the only state in the United States that won’t allow a prescription drug database to be established.
Other Views: No time to turn away
With the shooting down of a commercial airliner over Ukraine and fighting that has now escalated to a ground war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, it would be easy for most U.S. citizens to throw up their hands and turn their backs.
Your View: Amendment 5 is deception of the highest order
Amendment 5, sponsored by Missouri Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, “relating to the right of Missouri citizens to keep and bear arms” provides that “any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny.”
Your View: Power to defend
The Globe’s editorial ‘More guns not the answer’ (July 15) was saturated with classic progressive blather.
- More Opinion Headlines
- Our View: MDC’s got it right