The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


January 24, 2013

Our View: Rules makers, breakers

Let’s see if we’ve got this right.

The people who make the rules for the rest of us in the state don’t have to abide by those same rules in their offices. Is that it?

It’s hard to interpret it any other way, based on votes in the Missouri House of Representatives last week that determined members can continue to smoke in their House offices.

A majority of Missouri House members, including those in the Joplin-area delegation, voted to reject a proposal to ban smoking in member offices. Another proposal to leave smoking policy to the decision of the caucuses passed.

The votes come despite a smoking ban in place in all state buildings, except for prisons, and all public areas of the Capitol.

So only prisoners and legislators can smoke. Draw your own conclusions.

The vote also means that legislators are thumbing their noses at restrictions in place in Jefferson City for two years after residents there voted in November 2010 to ban smoking in bars, restaurants and other indoor workplaces.

These are the same members who talk about the importance of decisions made at the local government level, and who say rules should prevail.

It’s not the first time in this short session that some members have sent the message that obeying the law can be selective — another member has proposed a bill that would exempt the state from any federal gun control regulations that are imposed by executive order or by Congress.

Pro-smoking arguments cited by the majority were that members worked long hours and erratic schedules and should be able to smoke in offices, and that productivity would be reduced when members who smoked had to leave their offices to light up. There are other staffers in the Capitol who also work long hours, but they don’t get a smoke break.

It reminds us of the Charlie Brown cartoon when the teacher or parents are talking and all that comes back is an unintelligible “WA WA WA.”

We hear what they’re saying.

But what it really sounds like is: “We make the rules. But they don’t apply to us.”

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN