—
“Show me your budget, and I will tell you what you value.” That’s what Vice President Joe Biden said last summer, and he meant it as a criticism of Republicans. Biden’s comment raises a question: Where are the Democrats’ values? They’re in hiding, judging from their unwillingness to present any budget plans for almost four years.
Republicans have drawn up and voted for serious budgets that make tough choices — even though making those choices exposed our side to political attacks. We were willing to take the hits, accept the controversy and make our case to the American people. The budgets we have proposed have, just as Biden said, reflected our aspirations: a strong defense, an affordable safety net, a private sector with the running room to thrive and renewed economic growth.
The Democrats have been less forthcoming. Senate Democrats now routinely ignore their legal obligation to pass a budget. House Republicans say that the Senate should either pass a budget or forfeit its pay, and they are right. Too often, though, the press has treated the Senate’s failure to budget as a minor procedural matter.
On the few occasions reporters have asked Democrats why they have chosen to dispense with budgets, Democrats have offered non-answers. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for example, claimed that Democrats did not need to have budgets because of the sequester deal of mid-2011. The Senate parliamentarian said that action wasn’t a budget, and she was right.
We will see whether Schumer’s words prove more binding on Democrats than the budget laws have been. In all likelihood, Democrats have opted not to pass budgets because they believe the political price would be too high.
Budgets lay out plans, and the Democrats don’t have any plans that will pass the straight-face test with the American people. The public will not tolerate the amount of debt and taxes that their spending plans require. If the federal government is to come anywhere near balancing the budget at the elevated spending levels the Democrats desire, we will have to tax Americans at all income levels at historically unprecedented rates. Or we will have to accept crippling and dangerous levels of federal debt — much worse even than today’s.
Debt and taxes beyond anything we’ve ever seen: That future may reflect the values of today’s Washington Democrat, but it’s not a political message they can afford to send.
Worse still for the Democrats, a budget of their own would take the sting out of their attacks on Republicans. Right now, they can attack Republicans for savage cuts without having to make an apples-to-apples comparison. They don’t compare our spending restraint, for example, to the ruinously high middle-class taxes their own policies will require. They compare our budget, implicitly, to a fantasy land where no choices need ever be made — where budgeting is no longer necessary.
It’s been said that failing to plan is planning to fail. When it comes to our budgetary future, though, that’s the Democrats’ strategy.
As treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner openly told Congress that the administration has no plan to deal with the long-term debt problem — it just knows it doesn’t like the Republican plan.
My Republican colleagues and I have voted for a budget that levels with the public about the difficult choices we face in this fiscal environment. It’s time Democrats do the same.
Sen. Roy Blunt is a Republican from Missouri.
Opinion
Roy Blunt, guest columnist: Democrats' lack of plans spells doom for U.S.
- Opinion
-
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
-
Herb B. Kuhn, guest columnist: Delaying Medicaid reform could hurt rural Missouri
The Missouri Legislature missed a rare opportunity in the just-ended session to transform Medicaid and make a real difference in the lives and health of hundreds of thousands of our neighbors. Rural Missouri has the most to lose from the legislature’s failure to act.
-
Kevin Wilson, guest columnist: When fear wins out, so do the terrorists
I’m going to make a bold statement that’s sure to draw a lot of comments, but hear me out before reaching for the keyboard to type a rebuttal.
-
Sandie Morgan, guest columnist: Unions benefit workers more than they may know
In a recent guest column (Globe, May 14), Elliott Denniston made the case for Missouri not to become a right-to-work state, and he made this case very well.
-
Marta Mossburg, columnist: Maybe government is tyrannical after all
Less than two weeks ago President Obama stood in front of graduates from The Ohio State University and told them to reject those who warn of government tyranny.
-
Our View: Spying on us
Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.
-
Our View: Pass on the legacy
Forty hungry members of the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteer Infantry began gathering corn at the Rader farm near the village of Sherwood when they were ambushed by a guerrilla band of about 70 Southern sympathizers.
-
Our View: Big Brother looms large
The federal government, working under the cloak of secrecy, has been having a heyday at the expense of all Americans.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



