The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


June 9, 2012

Kevin Wilson, guest columnist: Nursing home disaster plans lack readiness

— I recently read an article with the headline, “Nursing homes’ plans for disaster found lacking.” The Associated Press reported that federal investigators say nursing homes are “woefully unprepared to protect frail residents in a natural disaster.” That should come as no surprise to the people of this area.

We just commemorated the first anniversary of one of the deadliest tornadoes in history, and among the dead were several residents of nursing homes.

I don’t pretend to imply that even a well-designed disaster plan could really take into account the type of devastation that hit Joplin last year. Even the best of plans could not turn back the winds that destroyed a hospital built to withstand such forces.

But the problem is that some facilities don’t have a plan in place that addresses lesser disasters. I question whether or not those that do have a plan actually practice the drills with a real world scenario in mind. It’s one thing to have a plan written down on paper in order to fulfill a check mark on an inspection list. It’s quite another to have a plan that actually works.

Many of you reading this column probably remember the tragedy at the Anderson Guest House that resulted in a new law requiring sprinklers and smoke detection systems in extended care facilities. It comes as no surprise that there were several people around the state who fought hard against such requirements — even in the wake of the deadly fire. Members of Congress had to overcome a lot of hurdles to get that law passed. Last year, the lobby against the mandates tried to push the law’s enactment out for at least two more years. Thankfully that effort was defeated, and the provisions will take effect on schedule.

I know that at one point in time, I wanted to pass legislation that would require nursing homes to have general liability insurance just for routine issues that come up from time to time. I had a lobbyist tell me to go ahead and file the bill and he would just “kill it.” Needless to say, that particular individual was banned from my office for the rest of the time that I was in the legislature. But the sad fact is that we were never able to make that legislation happen.

I’m not trying to paint a disparaging picture of the entire nursing home industry. The folks that I know who are involved in the care of some of our most vulnerable citizens truly do want to do what is right. But there are some in the industry who are more interested in profits than they are in people. Those are the ones that we need to focus on changing.

And we have to acknowledge that even those who want to do the right thing are faced with huge financial obstacles in preparing their facilities for disasters. I once visited with state officials about requiring nursing homes to have emergency power generation capability in case of outages, and I was thoroughly shocked by the cost of just that one provision.

All of us want nursing homes to be safer and better prepared, but at the same time, all of us recognize the mounting costs associated with extended care facilities. We want safety, but are we willing to pay more for that safety? Or will we just beat our chests when something tragic occurs and ask why the nursing home couldn’t have prevented it? I think we know the answer to that one.

I guess the point of this column is to raise awareness among the general public that we have a huge issue with regard to the safety of nursing homes.

I don’t have a solution to the problem. But I do know that we need to make sure that those who care for our loved ones at least have some kind of practiced plan in place in the event that a disaster or tragedy occurs. More would be better, but at least this is a place to start.

Kevin Wilson is a former state representative. He lives in Neosho.

Text Only
  • Other Views Other Views: Eroding court’s authority

    While Kansans were focused on the twists and turns of school finance this past week, lawmakers made an unnecessary and historic change in how the state’s district courts operate, coercively tying the reforms to badly needed funding.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Travesty

    What a travesty that a terrific young man from Spain is on the verge of deportation even though he has proven his worth in America (Globe, April 13).

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: Astonishing transformation

    The transformation of the Republican Party in the last decade is astonishing.

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: The changing view

    It is heartbreaking to hear the decades old trees (which border on South Pennsylvania in Webb City) cracking and being bulldozed down.

    April 18, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Safe and sound

    Of the 7,500 Joplin and Duenweg homes hit by the 2011 EF-5 tornado, fewer than 20 percent of them had basements.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Funding for state’s roads

    Missouri is finding there is no good alternative to growing the economy, adding new well-paying jobs and expanding the tax base.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Government without apology or explanation

    Americans feel closest to their Uncle Sam at this time of year as he extends his hand for his “fair share” to fund his numerous endeavors.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Step aside

    The people of Joplin made it clear they wanted change at City Hall with their decisive votes to replace two council members.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Serious drawbacks

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) lays out clearly and persuasively the serious drawbacks with so-called right-to-work legislation.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Free choice

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) regarding right-to-work seems to assume that if workers are given the choice of joining a union, they won’t join.

    April 16, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A Missouri Senate committee has endorsed a 1-cent sales tax increase to fund transportation projects. The proposed constitutional amendment passed the House earlier this month. If passed by the full Senate, the measure would head to the November ballot for voter approval. Would you vote in favor of it?

     View Results
NDN Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case