The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 1, 2013

Other Views: Distressed by scuttled hearing

— Sound the retreat. The Missouri Public Service Commission has backed off its plan to hold a public hearing on a utility surcharge proposal being considered by lawmakers.

Last Thursday, we commended the PSC for reviving a 1939 authorization to receive public testimony on this controversial issue.

The PSC reversal of the planned hearing followed a letter from Senate President Pro Tem Tom Dempsey, R-St. Charles, who questioned a procedural point.

The nearly 75-year-old authorization requires a hearing request to be submitted by “the legislature or either branch thereof.” The PSC set the hearing at the request of a single lawmaker, which Dempsey said would set a precedent.

He strongly encouraged the PSC to reconsider its decision.

The commission not only reconsidered, it retreated.

That’s too bad.

The utility surcharge proposal is among the more hotly contested issues this legislative session.

The proposal would permit investor-owned utilities — Ameren Missouri, KCP&L and Empire District — to repair infrastructure using money collected from a surcharge on customers’ bills prior to comprehensive PSC action and approval of the fee.

Supporters and opponents have lined up to advance their arguments.

Supporters say the infrastructure system repair surcharge, or ISRS, would expedite repair of aging infrastructure. They point out an abbreviated PSC analysis would be required to impose the fee, which also would be subject to a comprehensive rate case at a later date.

Opponents cite the cascade of rate increases borne by customers and characterize the surcharge as unnecessary and unfair.

We support a hearing before the PSC, because of its dual allegiance to customers and utility investors. The commission’s stated mission is “to ensure Missouri consumers have access to safe, reliable and reasonably priced utility service while allowing those utility companies under our jurisdiction an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment.”

We understand the procedural objections, as well as reservations about holding a hearing and receiving recommendations this late in the legislative session.

But the magnitude of controversy on an issue deserves to be directly proportional to the scrutiny.

A PSC hearing on the issue may be a late arrival to the party, but its presence would be welcome. After all, how could it hurt?

Jefferson City News Tribune

1
Text Only
Opinion
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Amendment 8 in Missouri proposes a special lottery ticket to help fund state veterans homes. How will you vote?

For it.
Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Crashed Air Algerie Plane Found in Mali Israel Mulls Ceasefire Amid Gaza Offensive In Case of Fire, Oxygen Masks for Pets Mobile App Gives Tour of Battle of Atlanta Sites Anti-violence Advocate Killed, but Not Silenced. Dempsey: Putin May Light Fire and Lose Control Arizona Prison Chief: Execution Wasn't Botched Calif. Police Investigate Peacock Shooting Death Raw: Protesters, Soldiers Clash in West Bank Police: Doctor Who Shot Gunman 'Saved Lives' 'Modern Family' Star on Gay Athletes Coming Out MN Twins Debut Beer Vending Machine DA: Pa. Doctor Fired Back at Hospital Gunman Raw: Iowa Police Dash Cam Shows Wild Chase Obama Seeks Limits on US Company Mergers Abroad Large Family to Share NJ Lottery Winnings U.S. Flights to Israel Resume After Ban Lifted Official: Air Algerie Flight 'probably Crashed' TSA Administrator on Politics and Flight Bans Raw: National Guard Helps Battle WA Wildfires
Sports