The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 4, 2013

Your View: Redistricting raises some questions

JOPLIN, Mo. — A recent Joplin Globe article was about a meeting held regarding the Joplin School District and a group of parents who presented an alternative solution to the redistricting report’s recommendations.

First, I would like to thank board member Jim Kimbrough for wanting to seek more input from parents and wanting to work with parents on their concerns.

Second, a person on the committee stated the committee had to be careful about appearing to cater to “special interest groups.” I feel this is precisely the problem we have had in our school district for the past few years.

It is time for everyone to realize that parents are not a special interest group and neither are taxpayers. Parents are taxpayers, and every member of both groups have a vested interest in everything going on in our school district.

Parents send their most valuable and precious assets (their children) to our schools. As a result, they have a right to know everything that is going on down to the details. Since taxpayers are paying the bills, they have the same rights.

For quite some time now I have recognized some problems in our school district, and I believe they are now spreading. The main problem is an attempt to keep the public (parents and taxpayers) out.

This started with not allowing the public to speak at school board meetings unless they are speaking on an agenda topic. Now I feel that mindset has spread to people serving on the redistricting committee with the comment about special interest groups.

It seems that if an idea is not generated by our administration, it is not even considered. However, for our district to be successful and safe for children and employees, we need input from everyone on a real safety committee.

David Guilford


Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating