The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 4, 2014

Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Fewer platitudes, more answers please

JOPLIN, Mo. — How can the democratic process provide real substance to enable voters to make thoughtful decisions in important elections?

I must say that concerns me a lot today in Joplin in our information age. When complex issues are at stake in an election, how can voters make good value judgments about each candidate and how they would resolve the issues?

Voters should understand the fundamental issues, not just the sound bites underlying the upcoming election. They are important, critical if you will to Joplin’s future in the coming years. Transparency is a buzz word often used, but some in government have failed rather miserably on that count here in Joplin. So what should be done is the question and candidates generally don’t provide substantial answers. “I will be transparent with everyone” is a platitude, not a real answer, in my view.

Simply stated, candidates do all possible to avoid taking public positions on complex and controversial issues in order not to anger anyone. And when really inflammatory matters come to the forefront, such as the recent firing of City Manager Mark Rohr, that action alone becomes the basis on which many people decide how to vote. It is more fundamental than just that one action by the council, in my view.

Many candidates repeat the concern about lack of progress in rebuilding major public-private partnership projects. Yet few candidates understand the challenges in such venues — such as mixing public and private money to build projects — and certainly none offer a “better way” to move forward.

Face it folks, no private investor alone will undertake such huge projects when the project is designed to meet the fundamental needs of a city. Creating a “new and more beautiful city” does not in itself make money for a single business. It takes planning, long and broad experience in beginning and ultimately completing such projects, and outside assistance is needed. But for a candidate to echo public sentiment that we are “not moving dirt fast enough” is a facile sentiment and demonstrates lack of understanding of such project development.

Move to a central theme in the current race for Joplin Schools Board of Education.

“We need to take better care of teachers” (or words to that effect) is often heard as a platitude in the current campaign. My concern is much broader. Our public education system, in my view, has been on a significant downward trend for several decades now and America is suffering as a consequence. The crux of the problem seen in Joplin and throughout most public education systems in America is the failure of students to gain both the academic knowledge and the ability to behave as good citizens in a modern society.

Only in private conversations with some teachers and other educators have I heard meaningful discussion of the fundamental problem of student achievement. You never hear that issue addressed in the current campaign or platform statements developed by candidates with substance behind the slogans. Those are complex and difficult choices to make by people leading our public education system. Why not talk about solutions, broadly and in depth?

One final point, “listening carefully to what the people want.” That comes with any public office and every public official must do so, listen carefully. But far more is needed to govern. People in power must talk to the people, one at a time if needed, and be willing to publicly discuss their own views on controversial subjects.

Wise decisions, some perhaps unpopular decisions, must be made by executives, people leading public institutions on policy issues. If such executives spend all their time “listening to the people,” then little gets accomplished in the cacophony of the information age.

Members of our city council and BOE must make decisions and be open and honest as they do the hard work to reach their own conclusions as to what is best for our city and our schools. And when controversial decisions are made, appropriately or inappropriately, government officials must have the courage to tell us why they voted as they did on a given issue. No sound bites please. Try real discussion, in depth and reflecting deep understanding of exactly what is at stake.

If we the people do not have access to and the ability to understand the inner workings and hidden mechanisms of government in a democracy, then democracy struggles to govern effectively.

Now go make up your minds for whom to vote on April 8. Our future government, locally, is waiting for our collective direction in that regard.

Anson Burlingame lives in Joplin.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Missouri's sales tax-free weekend begins Friday. Do you plan purchases around this weekend?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN
Sports