The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 28, 2012

Bruce Secrist, guest columnist: It’s not perfect, but Missouri Plan makes sense

— After reading Rep. Bill White’s recent editorial, “Missourians deserve to vote on judicial selection,” (The Globe, April 8) I was left to wonder if his motivation is truly the pursuit of fairness for all Missourians or simply an effort to see specific kinds of decisions from our courts.

He concludes that the Missouri Plan just does not make sense. He will be glad to hear that the Missouri Plan was originally adopted in Missouri by a vote of the people in order to keep money and various political machines from dominating the election of judges, and to assist with the backlog of cases caused by judges out on the campaign trail. This merit system of electing judges has been adopted by well over 30 other states. The Appellate Judicial Commission is composed of an equal number of lawyers and private citizens in an attempt to keep the process from being dominated by any one group, including trial attorneys.

By the way, White’s concern about trial attorneys caused me to reflect. Am I a trial attorney? You know that trial attorneys have been blamed for everything from doctors quitting the practice of medicine to global warming. I’m not sure what qualifies an attorney as a “trial attorney.” Nearly every private practice attorney I know has represented a client in a trial. I guess by definition we are all trial attorneys. Over my 29 years of practicing law, I have also filed many lawsuits. Trial attorneys convicted Charles Manson and overturned years of discrimination because of the color of one’s skin in Brown v. Topeka Board of Education. I could have no prouder professional accomplishment than to qualify as a “trial attorney.”

Having said that, do I vouch for everything every trial attorney has ever done or litigated? Nope. Just like I do not approve of everything every politician, doctor, football coach or priest ever did.

According to White, who lives in Joplin, Missouri’s appellate judicial system is not working, and the Missouri Plan makes no sense. Keep in mind that the Missouri Plan is a system voted on by the people of Missouri as the best way to keep politics and campaigns out of the court system. Not the perfect way, but the best way. Our Founding Fathers were also fine with the idea of having federal judges appointed by the executive branch rather than subjecting them to politic al campaigning and influence from big donors.

Based upon rankings by the American Tort Reform Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, White comes to the conclusion that clearly, something is wrong with Missouri’s appellate court system. Really? That’s akin to quoting Rush Limbaugh to support your position that Obama is a bad president. Do you really expect a non-agenda driven analysis?

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce rates the Missouri court system poorly. The state of Louisiana pushed back when they received a poor rating. The Louisiana Supreme Court appointed a committee to investigate the ranking. Since there are so few such rankings (because of the difficulty in objectively ranking such things), The U.S. Chamber of Commerce ranking carries some weight. Louisiana found that the chamber’s rankings are generated by surveying attorneys, litigators and employees all working for corporations worth $100 million or more. Their opinions were included whether they were “very familiar” or even only “somewhat familiar” with that particular state’s system. Also, the chamber’s ranking was for the entire state system and not just the appellate court system. I wonder what influences the opinions of those $100 million corporate employees who completed surveys for the chamber. The chamber is a great organization, but all organizations have agendas. The chamber itself says its rankings are based on how corporate attorneys view the system. A recent Cornell University study discredits the chamber’s rankings because of its failure to consider the input of parties on both sides of disputes.

And as for the American Tort Reform Association, the name pretty much says it all. Their goal is to reform the tort system. The members are largely medical associations (remember, all organizations have agendas) and their rankings are based upon whether a particular court system is reforming pursuant to their goals of reform. It has very little, if anything, to do with a court system’s competence, productivity, independence or influence (how often other states cite their decisions.)

Recently, in San Antonio, an attorney acted inappropriately in a case that was being prosecuted. The ATRA purchased a billboard next to the court house on which they printed an inappropriate quote from this attorney and attributed it to “A Still-Practicing Local Attorney.” The effect was to smear everyone in the legal community. I’m sure they are much more objective and “fair” when they rank court systems.

White opines that only when Missourians can vote on who will serve in our appellate court will our system be fixed. Evidently the chamber does not share that conclusion. The chamber rates Louisiana poorly (49 out of 50) even though they elect their appellate judges by vote of the people, and the Delaware court system is rated number one even though they have a selection process without a popular vote.

The citizens of Jasper County can be proud of their local and appellate court system regardless of the opinions of ATRA or the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Any good “trial attorney” will tell you that there are three sides to most cases: yours, theirs and the truth. I urge our elected representatives to fairly give their constituents all of the facts, not just the cherry-picked ones. Both sides of any issue need to be “fairly” considered. After all, fairness is really what we are all after. Right ATRA? Right U.S. Chamber?

Bruce Secrist is a Joplin attorney.

Text Only
  • Other Views Other Views: Eroding court’s authority

    While Kansans were focused on the twists and turns of school finance this past week, lawmakers made an unnecessary and historic change in how the state’s district courts operate, coercively tying the reforms to badly needed funding.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Travesty

    What a travesty that a terrific young man from Spain is on the verge of deportation even though he has proven his worth in America (Globe, April 13).

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: Astonishing transformation

    The transformation of the Republican Party in the last decade is astonishing.

    April 18, 2014

  • Your View: The changing view

    It is heartbreaking to hear the decades old trees (which border on South Pennsylvania in Webb City) cracking and being bulldozed down.

    April 18, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Safe and sound

    Of the 7,500 Joplin and Duenweg homes hit by the 2011 EF-5 tornado, fewer than 20 percent of them had basements.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Funding for state’s roads

    Missouri is finding there is no good alternative to growing the economy, adding new well-paying jobs and expanding the tax base.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Government without apology or explanation

    Americans feel closest to their Uncle Sam at this time of year as he extends his hand for his “fair share” to fund his numerous endeavors.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Step aside

    The people of Joplin made it clear they wanted change at City Hall with their decisive votes to replace two council members.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Serious drawbacks

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) lays out clearly and persuasively the serious drawbacks with so-called right-to-work legislation.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Free choice

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) regarding right-to-work seems to assume that if workers are given the choice of joining a union, they won’t join.

    April 16, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A Missouri Senate committee has endorsed a 1-cent sales tax increase to fund transportation projects. The proposed constitutional amendment passed the House earlier this month. If passed by the full Senate, the measure would head to the November ballot for voter approval. Would you vote in favor of it?

     View Results
NDN Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case