The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

October 20, 2012

Our View: Amendment would damage courts

A group of outraged Missourians, tired of corruption in their courts, got to work to bring about change. The year was 1937.

They used the initiative petition process to put what’s called “the Missouri Plan” on the ballot. Voters passed it in 1940, ending an era of “boss” politics within the courts.

On Nov. 6, voters will render a verdict on the future of the Missouri Plan. It’s listed on the ballot as Constitutional Amendment 3, and, in our opinion, it would unnecessarily change a nonpartisan court plan that has been imitated by more than 30 states across the nation. Under the plan, when a vacancy occurs for a judge on the state Supreme Court or an appellate court, a judicial nominating commission interviews interested applicants and picks three of them as judicial nominees. The governor then selects the new judge from one of those three nominees.

Members of the selection commission are lawyers and non-lawyers from different parts of the state, and terms have been staggered such that they are not necessarily of the same political party as the governor. This keeps the process apolitical. In addition, the three largest metropolitan areas of the state have adopted this plan for their trial-level judges. Greene County voters recently adopted the plan.

Once appointed, these judges are regularly evaluated by lawyers and members of the public who serve as jurors, and the ratings they receive are publicized by the Missouri Bar so that voters, who are asked whether they should be retained, can focus on their skills and work. The names of the applicants for these positions are public record. Members of the public may send letters to the nominating commission or to the governor to express their opinion about a candidate.

The ballot proposal that will be before you on Nov. 6 would modify the composition of the Appellate Judicial Commission and the selection process for appointing judges to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. It would eliminate the chief justice as a member and give the governor the power to appoint four citizen members, who may be lawyers, in addition to the three lawyers the bar association appoints. It would increase from three to four the number of nominees the commission presents to the governor and would eliminate the staggered terms of the commissioners, allowing the governor to appoint four members in his first year in office.

Since 2002, efforts have been made to change the Missouri Plan. Those efforts have largely been supported through out-of-state efforts and dollars. This newspaper has consistently voiced opposition to the efforts to overturn the Missouri Plan.

On Aug. 1, Missouri Supreme Court Judge Ray Price stepped down after 20 years of service, including two terms as chief justice. He made his decision to retire now because he wanted to be sure that his successor would be appointed under the Missouri Plan. Price told us on Friday that those who want to change the plan have lost sight of the common good of a fair and balanced court system.

“The proposals (to change the plan) are interjected with influence and the power of money,” Price said.

There’s no question that big money is being spent to try to influence judges. Price said that from 1990 to 1999, $83.3 million was spent on judicial elections nationwide. That number more than doubled from the year 2000 to 2009.

We don’t want judges who are bought and paid for in Missouri. And we don’t want Constitutional Amendment 3 to go into effect.

Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Spying on us

    Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.

    May 16, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Pass on the legacy

    Forty hungry members of the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteer Infantry began gathering corn at the Rader farm near the village of Sherwood when they were ambushed by a guerrilla band of about 70 Southern sympathizers.

    May 16, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Big Brother looms large

    The federal government, working under the cloak of secrecy, has been having a heyday at the expense of all Americans.

    May 15, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Disgraceful military assault

    We want to make one thing clear: A sexual assault is not a sex scandal. Nor can the rise in sexual assaults in the military be justified in any way.

    May 14, 2013 1 Photo

  • Elliott Denniston, guest columnist: Right-to-work laws only hurt workers

    Middle-class workers have been fighting an uphill battle for the past 30 years.

    May 14, 2013

  • Your View: Food drive efforts

    Branch No. 366 of the National Association of Letter Carriers along with the National Rural Letter Carriers Association, the American Postal Workers Union and the U.S. Postal Service would like to thank all the area communities that participated in the 2013 Stamp Out Hunger food drive.

    May 13, 2013

  • Your View: More about tax credit

    The Globe’s editorial in “Our View” (May 10) may have left readers with a few inaccurate impressions.

    May 13, 2013

  • Other Views Other Views: Sickening disparity

    Don’t feel bad if you don’t understand the wide, sometimes huge, discrepancies in fees hospitals charge for the same procedure. Or if you don’t understand the arithmetical magic the hospitals use to arrive at those fees.

    May 13, 2013 1 Photo

  • Carol Stark: America in need of more 'momisms'

    Several years ago, I attended a writing workshop where one of the sessions was called “Tell it to Mom.”

    May 13, 2013

  • Our View: Keep learning

    Donna Maus, a biology teacher from St. Mary’s Colgan High School in Pittsburg, Kan., told a group of top students, their parents and their teachers something we think everyone needs to hear.

    May 13, 2013

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Poll

Parents could give up their babies without legal consequences up to 45 days after birth under a bill sent to Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon. The “safe harbor” extension from five days to 45 days could prevent child abuse, say supporters. Should Nixon sign the bill?

Yes.
No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Probe Begins After Conn. Commuter Trains Crash NTSB Begins Investigation Into Conn. Train Crash Lotto Fever Sweeps the Country Conn. Commuter Trains Collide; 60 Go to Hospital Coffee Run Leads to Hatchet Hitchhiker Arrest Fmr. IRS Head Insists No Politics in Targeting CDC: Fecal Bacteria Common in Swimming Pools $1 Million in Jewels Stolen at Cannes Film Fest NM Mom Chases Down Child Abductor Raw: Crash Sends Car Into Fla. Pool Raw: Obama Sits Down With Elementary Kids Raw: Bear Falls From Tampa Tree Ousted IRS Chief: Errors Not Caused by Politics Terror Suspect Due in Court in Idaho Friday Raw: Driver Ejected From Truck, Over Bridge Could Tobacco Be the Next Biofuel? Wash. State Releases Draft Rules for Legal Pot Dying Man's Blinks Lead to Murder Conviction Officials: Texas Tornado Likely Had 200 Mph Wind Brothers Arrested in NOLA Parade Shooting
Sports