The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


October 22, 2012

Bret Baker, guest columnist: Candidates differ on how to solve nation's problems

GROVE, Okla. — I was very encouraged when candidates decided to address Medicare in this election campaign, but I’ve been disappointed by the direction of the discussion so far.

Candidates from both parties seem to be trying to use the issue as a cudgel against their opponents, rather than using this issue to clarify the very important differences and letting voters make the decision. Here is what I believe should be the message on Medicare, from both Republicans and Democrats:

“We agree that providing health care for senior citizens is an appropriate role of the federal government. We also agree that the current cost of Medicare is not sustainable in the future. We have agreed that a $712 billion reduction in Medicare costs over the next 10 years is a reasonable start in assuring the long-term sustainability of Medicare.

“We all believe that much of these targeted cost reductions can be achieved by eliminating inefficiencies (duplication, unnecessary procedures, waste and fraud). Most importantly, we also agree that if we cannot meet the cost reduction targets through elimination of inefficiencies, then we must reduce benefits to assure the long-term viability of federally funded health care for our senior citizens.”

Here is where the two sides disagree: Democrats believe that the federal government, working through existing and future review processes, is in the best position to identify and reduce the inefficiencies in health care delivery to seniors. If the targeted savings can’t be achieved by eliminating inefficiencies, then the government is most capable to make the decisions about which benefits shall no longer be federally funded.

 Republicans believe that individuals, working through a competitive health care marketplace, are in the best position to identify and reduce the inefficiencies in health care delivery to seniors. If the targeted savings can’t be achieved by eliminating inefficiencies, then individuals should make the decisions about which benefits shall no longer be federally funded.

I am not saying that one side is right or wrong on the Medicare issue, and I don’t think our political candidates and parties should be saying that either. Republicans and Democrats have different visions of how to solve the problems facing America. We need to focus on the differences in visions — not disparaging the other side for its well-founded beliefs. We need to choose the direction we want America to take by voting on Nov. 6.

Bret B. Baker lives in Grove, Okla.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri's sales tax-free weekend begins Friday. Do you plan purchases around this weekend?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN