The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

October 22, 2012

Marta Mossburg, columnist: October a month shrouded in secrecy

What a great month for lies. It’s almost as good as when the nation was forced to ponder the meaning of “is” by President Bill Clinton trying to wiggle his way out of the l’affaire Lewinsky.

The first ones started flying immediately after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. They could be called “buy some time lies” or even “focus group lies,” to see which noodles would stick to the wall, so to speak.

On Sept. 12 White House spokesman Jay Carney said, “It’s too early for us to make that judgment (on whether it was a planned attack). I think — I know that this is being investigated, and we’re working with the Libyan government to investigate the incident. So, I would not want to speculate on that at this time.”

On the same day, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insinuated it could have been video clips from “Innocence of Muslims”: “We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

On Sept. 13, Mr. Carney’s arduous quest for the truth ended: “The protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie. They are not directly in reaction to any policy of the United States or the government of the United States or the people of the United States,” he said.

Those statements could be forgiven as bad attempts to explain to the members of the voracious 24/7 news media the situation during a chaotic time.

Once made, the administration wouldn’t back down in spite of a deluge of evidence contradicting official accounts.

On Sept. 13, the same day the video was being blamed for the deaths by anyone connected to President Barack Obama, an anonymous state department official told CNN that, “It was not an innocent mob. …The video or 9/11 made a handy excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective, but this was a clearly planned military-type attack.”

Videos were out at that point, too. Anyone who had seen footage of the attack would have surmised the same thing. People do not carry rocket-propelled grenade launchers to spontaneous demonstrations.

Yet, there was no change in the party line from the White House, as if this were some dispute about the president’s golf score, not about the first U.S. ambassador killed since 1979 and three other American deaths.

Worse was yet to come. On Sept. 16, five days after the attack, United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice visited Sunday talk shows to proclaim what everyone already knew to be false: The video did it.

Apparently when the administration lies, it does so Bernie Madoff style.

After her appearance, however, the party line began to look like one of Jackson Pollock’s drip paintings with one set of officials contradicting another set on an almost daily basis. For example, claims that no one asked for more security at the embassy were shot down by a state department official. According to The Associated Press, the official said, “she had refused requests for more security in Benghazi because the department wanted to train Libyans for the task. Another U.S. official testified he had argued unsuccessfully for more security for weeks.”

And earlier this week President Obama said he called the murders of the four Americans an “act of terror” from the beginning in his debate with Republican rival Mitt Romney. He didn’t. What he said in the Rose Garden on Sept. 12 was: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.” He was speaking generally in that sentence, not specifically referring to the killings of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans. As late as Sept. 25 he refused to call what happened in Benghazi a terrorist attack when asked about it by Joy Behar on “The View.”

All of this must be doing wonders for recruiting diplomats. And it has to make Americans wonder what other fibs the administration has fed the public if they could so cavalierly mock the truth on Libya.

Marta H. Mossburg writes about national affairs and politics in Maryland, where she lives. Read her work at www.martamossburg.com. Write her at marta@martamossburg.com.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways
Sports