The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. FEC is a historic case, and a staggering blow against the First Amendment. In his Jan. 30, 2010 column, Leland Browne argues that an entity has the right to spend its own money in its own behalf.
While I agree with him where it concerns business decisions, I fail to understand how he has arrived at the illogical conclusion that corporations merit treatment equal to that of citizens of these United States. The Constitution, as I recall, starts with the words “We the people.” It does not say, “We, Nike, McDonald’s and Ford.”
Browne wastes no time in dismissing all critics of corporations, but fails to actually understand why these critics exist in the first place. Adam Smith even saw the possibility for corruption and dysfunction back in 1776 when he published “The Wealth of Nations.” He wrote, “The directors of such (joint-stock) companies, however, being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, it cannot well be expected that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private co-partnery frequently watch over their own... Negligence and profusion, therefore, must always prevail, more or less, in the management of the affairs of such a company.”
The modern corporation, especially the international variety, is a far cry from the original model, which had to have a very specific purpose and was constrained to a particular industry. But after the Civil War the laws began to shift, and the past 50 years have seen change of unprecedented scope.
Why do people consider corporations evil? Perhaps because that’s how they act, often putting profit before all other concerns. Consider the Ford Pinto, and it’s fatal rear-end design. Consider Nike, which moved its factories from Taiwan and Korea when minimum wages increased. Now it manufactures in countries like Vietnam, where workers average 20 cents per hour. Consider Monsanto, the agriculture giant based here in Missouri, which produces genetically modified seeds and has a habit of suing small farmers for patent infringement.
The obvious truth is that there are more than “a few” corporations with devious intent. The problem is it is endemic to the corporate structure. The unabated pursuit of profit causes individuals to make decisions that they otherwise wouldn’t if they were running a company or a local firm. The end result is Third World laborers work for slave wages while a select few reap obscene profits.
But, as Browne states, we shouldn’t be painting all corporations and individuals with the same brush. I agree. To put them in the same category is simply infantile. The living, breathing, citizens of these United States are what the Constitution was designed to uphold and protect. It was designed to protect our right to freedom of speech; to allow us, the ones who can speak, to voice our opinion on government. It was designed to allow us to make careful, balanced selections on who to elect to lead this nation. These rights do not belong to an entity whose sole purpose is profit for the stockholder and the board of directors.
A corporation should not be afforded the right to buy in to our political process and bombard us with billions of dollars of their opinion on who should be president, or who we should go to war with, or which way we should vote on the issues. Corporations do not have the best interests of our country at heart. They can’t. They don’t possess one.
Anthony Monteleone lives in Carl Junction.
Opinion
Anthony Monteleone, guest columnist: Corporations, politics shouldn’t mix
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






