Duenweg voters voiced their resentment toward a Joplin rate hike loud and clear on Tuesday when they approved a $6 million bond issue to build a wastewater treatment plant.
But, in what appears to be backlash against the city of Joplin’s out-of-city sewer rate increase, have the voters failed to demand from Duenweg city officials solid numbers for the costs associated with building the plant?
Mayor Russell Olds said city leaders did not want to spend the $30,000 to $100,000 it would cost for a rate study and an engineering study, so they don’t really know how much it will cost to build the plant. The $6 million figure on the ballot question is only an estimate.
Here’s what Olds told the Globe on Tuesday after voters passed the bond issue 112-29:
“We’re going to make sure that what we think we know, we know is correct, and that every step of the way we stay in touch with the public and keep them informed, and not make any moves without knowing we have informed the community.”
We understand why Duenweg ratepayers were upset last year when the Joplin City Council raised all categories of sewer rates and then tapped out-of-city users with an additional 30 percent surcharge hike. Joplin did not do a good enough job explaining to Duenweg about the need for the increase. Had Joplin made more of an effort, perhaps it would not have fed the backlash.
But Duenweg ratepayers deserve more than a “what we think we know” response from their own city leaders.
If costs associated with building the new plant exceed the $6 million estimate, then, in our view, Duenweg must return the question to the voters.
Opinion
In our view: Backlash effect
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






