The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 21, 2014

Other Views: Robbing the poor

— Combining their “income inequality” obsession with business bashing, some liberals are blaming supposed corporate greed for the financial challenges of the poor. Such theories are only plausible in the abstract. Under scrutiny, they fall apart.

A recent video produced by Slate, a liberal website, argues that Wal-Mart could raise wages and ultimately save taxpayer money because fewer of its workers would qualify for food stamps. Currently, Slate says, cashiers are paid an average wage of $8.81 per hour. To raise that sum to $13.63, Slate argues, Wal-Mart could raise prices 1.4 percent. A 68-cent box of macaroni and cheese would instead cost 69 cents. Slate claims this would keep many Wal-Mart employees off food stamps.

This sounds like a win-win. But Robert VerBruggen, editor of RealClearPolicy, notes the plan has some major flaws. For one thing, it requires some poor people to pay more for goods so other equally poor people can get a raise. This isn’t Robin Hood robbing the rich to give to the poor. It’s robbing the poor to give to the poor. Research from the University of California at Berkeley has concluded that if Wal-Mart raised prices to fund a higher minimum wage, 28.1 percent of the price increase would be borne by consumers in families with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Many other Wal-Mart customers facing higher prices are thoroughly middle-income families who aren’t exactly rolling in dough.

“Transferring $100 from Wal-Mart customers to the lowest-paid Wal-Mart employees is like taking $28 from some poor people and giving it to other poor people, taking $59 from some nonpoor people and giving it to other nonpoor people, and taking $13 from nonpoor people and giving it to poor people,” VerBruggen writes.

Even if that doesn’t bother you, the plan has other problems. For one thing, about half of that cashier’s raise would be immediately lost thanks to the perverse incentives of welfare.

Jeffrey Dorman, a Forbes contributor, has noted that those on welfare could face a huge effective tax rate if their minimum wage was increased to $10.10 per hour. Dorman wrote that “a hypothetical single mom with one kid would see more than half of the proposed minimum wage increase offset by a reduction in benefits from the federal government and increased taxes.” The hypothetical mother would face a reduction in her federal Earned Income Tax Credit and in food stamp support. She would now have to pay employment taxes on her increased earnings.

In the abstract realm of liberal economics, businesses can simply raise prices at will, and everyone benefits; no one gets seriously hurt. But reality remains stubbornly resistant to liberal nostrums. Those pushing a minimum wage hike in Oklahoma City should keep this lesson in mind.

—The Oklahoman, Oklahoma City

Text Only
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A new provision by the U.S. Department of Agriculture allows qualifying districts with high percentages of students on food assistance to allow all students to eat free breakfasts and lunches. Would you agree with this provision?

     View Results
NDN Video
Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Palestinians and Israeli Soldiers Clash Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kerry: No Deal Yet on 7-Day Gaza Truce Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Gaza Residents Mourn Dead Amid Airstrikes Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp Cumberbatch Brings 'Penguins' to Comic-Con Raw: Air Algerie Crash Site in Mali Power to Be Restored After Wash. Wildfire Crashed Air Algerie Plane Found in Mali Israel Mulls Ceasefire Amid Gaza Offensive