Regarding capital punishment, I thought the letters published in the Globe (Jan. 31), while thought provoking, missed the point. Capital “punishment” for murder is not for “punishment,” nor primarily as a deterrent.
It is to fulfill the fundamental principle of justice. The essence of justice is equity, fairness. Criminals, especially murderers, commit acts to abolish the laws the Creator mandated for civilized society. In doing so, they, in effect, declare themselves violently opposed to that which alone can guarantee a civilized society — law and order. Murderers by their own actions declare they do not respect the sanctity of human life. Therefore, they should not be granted that sanctity for themselves.
When “murder” occurs at the instigation of an aggressor making war on an international scale, the defenders must kill (execute) the aggressors until “law and order” is restored. Thus defensive wars are “capital punishment” on an international proportion. The same “executions” must take place to stop violent insurrection on a national scale (e.g., America’s “Civil War”).
Capital punishment to validate the principle of justice pre-dates the Law of Moses by thousands of years. It is the first “law” God gave to Noah as he exited the ark after the flood to re-populate the earth.
“Whosoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed: for God made man in his own image” (Genesis 9:6).
On the side of simple logic, Immanuel Kant’s “categorical imperative” rings true and practical, i.e., just universalize an action to determine whether it is right or wrong.
If any human may, for no reason and at any time, take the life of any other human, without equal penalty, then civilized society cannot be maintained.
Paul T. Butler
Joplin
Opinion
Voices: First ‘law’
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






