Tonight, the president will give his State of the Union address. As Congress enters the chamber to hear what he has to say, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has her own resolution for 2010: ram through their government takeover of health care, despite the fact that only 37 percent of Missourians support the Democratic bill.
Despite the recent changes in the makeup of the Senate, House Democratic leaders are still not getting the message. They remain committed to trying to push through their reforms. The House and Senate versions of the bill (H.R. 3962 and H.R. 3590 respectively) still have differences that need to be resolved, but Washington Democrats are bent on fulfilling their New Year’s resolution behind closed doors and with no accountability. Meanwhile, our side continues to offer a clear and simple approach that improves access to health care, does not contain new, costly taxes and protects Americans’ jobs.
During his campaign, President Obama promised that health care negotiations would be transparent, broadcast on C-SPAN for all to see. However, as the details of each unpopular bill became better understood, national Democrats abandoned their promise, and are even circumventing the congressional procedures in order to avoid public scrutiny. That’s why I am trying to force the House to vote to open all health care negotiations to the public and the media. If the national Democrats are going to take over our health care system, they should have an audience.
The closed-door negotiations are far from over. First, the bills differ in how they would alter the current insurance market. Harry Reid’s bill would force states to set up insurance exchanges that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates would increase the cost of individual insurance by up to $2,100 per year. Meanwhile, Pelosi’s bill would set up a single government-run exchange that would remove flexibility for states and end the current individual insurance market. The Pelosi bill would also include a government-run insurance plan that could cause up to 114 million Americans to lose their health insurance, according to the nonpartisan Lewin Group. The array of regulation, mandates and price controls in these proposals offer only a taste of the confusion and bureaucracy of government-run health care.
Speaker Pelosi’s bill, which passed the House in November, includes over $700 billion in job-killing tax increases. These taxes hit small businesses, which employ over half of U.S. workers. This bill would also tax every individual who does not purchase a government-approved plan. The Reid bill would increase Medicare and Medicare payroll taxes and Medicaid rolls. Whatever the national Democrats decide, Americans know that higher taxes mean less money in their pockets and an estimated 5 million fewer jobs. Rather than raise taxes, I support plans that will lower health care costs for families and small businesses.
Because they’re negotiating behind closed doors, Democrats have freedom to throw sweeteners into the already-bloated health care bill. Harry Reid bought votes for his bad bill through backroom deals benefiting just a few, like the $300 million “Louisiana Purchase” and a $100 million “Cornhusker Kickback.” House Democrats even included a sweetheart deal for the unions, exempting them from the tax on “Cadillac” health plans.
The common-sense plan I support is not a takeover of health care, but will help individuals purchase health care across state lines, encourage small businesses to pool their insurance plans and reduce medical lawsuit abuse. The plan I support will reduce deficits by $68 billion over 10 years and lower insurance premiums for all groups.
This year, Americans are making clear, cost-conscious, achievable resolutions and are asking Congress to do the same — not make a $1 trillion-plus backroom deal that raises taxes, kills jobs and saddles future generations with debt.
U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., is a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate.
Opinion
Rep. Roy Blunt, guest columnist: Health bill demands transparency
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
-
Our View: Meaningless in Missouri
Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






