JOPLIN, Mo. —
Gov. Jay Nixon delivered his annual State of the State address Monday, highlighting his and the Democratic Party’s stance on entitlement programs — specifically Medicaid. Medicaid is an $8 billion program, which he’s advocating be expanded by another $1 billion. His talking points are:
“It’s the right thing to do.”
“It’s the smart thing to do.”
And that’s the depth of his argument.
For $1 billion, we, as a Legislature, expect more details, and Missourians should, too. Many in the Legislature, including myself, oppose the expansion of this entitlement, and here’s why:
The Missouri electorate has consistently reminded government officials that it will not accept tax increases, it does not favor Obamacare, nor has it supported those who have advocated either one.
President Obama lost Missouri in back-to-back presidential elections, and in 2012, Nixon campaigned on a theme of “no new taxes” — he never mentioned Obamacare or Medicaid expansion when making his case to the people.
In 2010, Proposition C, which rejects Obamacare, was passed overwhelmingly in Missouri to the tune of 70 percent of the vote. Last year, Proposition B — a proposed tax increase on cigarettes that would support education — also failed.
None of the advocates of the expansion have addressed how to pay for the expansion once Missouri’s share kicks in — an amount that will cost you and me hundreds of millions of dollars.
Next to social-program spending, which comprises almost one-third of Missouri’s current $24 billion budget, education is our largest expenditure. Our kids — our future job creators, employers and researchers — would see less funding per capita in the classroom if this shortsighted expansion is passed.
An economic analysis on the impact of Medicaid expansion was released late last year by the University of Missouri. Some have taken these figures as gospel. New jobs, they say. New tax revenue from new spending, they say. The problem with this thinking is glaring: It fails to account for where the source of the money and the economic implications.
This is not new money — it is borrowed, and it will ultimately come from our residents and our businesses. When people and businesses are required to give money to the government, that money cannot be spent in the private sector, invested in the future or saved for a rainy day.
Proponents conveniently ignore this inevitable economic squeeze. Let’s not forget that our federal government is making fiscal promises without passing a budget and by borrowing 40 cents of every $1.
Nixon finds it easy to call it “the right thing to do,” but I’m here to make responsible decisions. Nixon and his allies may be comfortable telling only half the story, but I’m here to be honest with you. I will not support this shortsighted, bankrupting idea.
The Legislature will be realistic and pragmatic. The right thing to do is to support limited government, better tax policy and growth strategies that encourage entrepreneurship and economic development.
That’s the right thing to do. That’s the smart thing to do.
Tom Flanigan is a Republican representing the 163rd District. He is chair of the House Appropriations Committee on Health, Mental Health and Social Services and is vice-chairman of the Budget Committee.
Opinion
Tom Flanigan, guest columnist: Nixon wrong about what is ‘right’ for Missouri
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Spying on us
Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.
-
Our View: Pass on the legacy
Forty hungry members of the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteer Infantry began gathering corn at the Rader farm near the village of Sherwood when they were ambushed by a guerrilla band of about 70 Southern sympathizers.
-
Our View: Big Brother looms large
The federal government, working under the cloak of secrecy, has been having a heyday at the expense of all Americans.
-
Our View: Disgraceful military assault
We want to make one thing clear: A sexual assault is not a sex scandal. Nor can the rise in sexual assaults in the military be justified in any way.
-
Elliott Denniston, guest columnist: Right-to-work laws only hurt workers
Middle-class workers have been fighting an uphill battle for the past 30 years.
-
Your View: Food drive efforts
Branch No. 366 of the National Association of Letter Carriers along with the National Rural Letter Carriers Association, the American Postal Workers Union and the U.S. Postal Service would like to thank all the area communities that participated in the 2013 Stamp Out Hunger food drive.
-
Your View: More about tax credit
The Globe’s editorial in “Our View” (May 10) may have left readers with a few inaccurate impressions.
-
Other Views: Sickening disparity
Don’t feel bad if you don’t understand the wide, sometimes huge, discrepancies in fees hospitals charge for the same procedure. Or if you don’t understand the arithmetical magic the hospitals use to arrive at those fees.
-
Carol Stark: America in need of more 'momisms'
Several years ago, I attended a writing workshop where one of the sessions was called “Tell it to Mom.”
-
Our View: Keep learning
Donna Maus, a biology teacher from St. Mary’s Colgan High School in Pittsburg, Kan., told a group of top students, their parents and their teachers something we think everyone needs to hear.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



