The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


December 6, 2012

Our View: Military intel changes

— Throughout the post-World War II era, the Defense Intelligence Agency has been part of the larger intelligence collection organization of the federal government. It is under the direct control of the secretary of defense.

Its primary intelligence focus has always been on matters of military intelligence collection, how other nations develop their own military plans and hardware. That now may be changing.

Over the past several years it now seems that interagency agreements of a sort have been developed between the Central Intelligence Agency and the DIA. In part, the role of the DIA to insert secret agents into foreign countries and take secret military action against some countries is being at least considered if not actually in place. In other words, the DIA is becoming an action-oriented covert organization, much as the CIA has been doing for years.

The details of the activities will never be fully disclosed in public commentary. But public comment on significantly expanding the roles of various intelligence groups within the broader context of American intelligence collection and covert activity to protect and defend America is warranted.

It would seem that the ties between the CIA and DIA will be strengthened by such further distribution of authority and responsibilities. But the question would then become which agency in fact is in charge of such collection and covert actions.

The legal authority to take covert military action by members of the Defense Department, as opposed to the CIA, comes into question.

Taken to the extreme, would America now expect a military attaché in a foreign country to be legally enabled to direct and take covert military action to capture or kill people in those countries? And under whose authority would those actions be taken?

All covert drone attacks overseas are currently under the authority of the CIA, for example. Would our military now have the authority to direct such actions as well?

These are issues that deserve full disclosure and public discussion. Expanding deadly roles and responsibilities to other federal organizations is indeed a matter of public interest and debate.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating