The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

February 11, 2014

Our View: Answers needed in Rohr firing, special investigation

Questions we have plenty; it’s answers that are in short supply in regard to the firing of Joplin City Manager Mark Rohr and details included in the findings of a special investigator hired by the Joplin City Council.

Members of the council met behind closed doors for more than four hours on Feb. 4. The public was led to believe that closed-door session was held so that City Attorney Brian Head and a hired investigator, Tom Loraine, could give their legal conclusions to the council. A meeting agenda never mentioned the doors would be closed for personnel action, so the public had no idea that a large portion of the secret meeting was used to discuss details in Loraine’s report about Rohr.

In fact, because Loraine was never charged with providing details of Rohr’s management to the council, the public would have no reason to suspect that was what was going on behind closed doors.

At the end of a long night, the public report consisted of 17 pages of a 27-page report. The 10 pages about Rohr had been removed.

Also missing were all of the exhibits used by the investigator to answer questions regarding Councilman Bill Scearce’s association with a convicted bookmaker and Councilman Mike Woolston’s role in property that eventually was bought by the city’s land bank, the Joplin Redevelopment Corp., for tornado redevelopment projects. Loraine’s report addressed the Scearce questions by concluding that Scearce had committed no criminal wrongdoing. He questioned whether there were improprieties in Woolston helping contractor Charlie Kuehn buy property that was sold to the Joplin Redevelopment Corp. It also questioned fees charged by the master developer, Wallace Bajjali Development Partners.

Loraine states in the report that 51 witnesses were interviewed under oath and that “hundreds of pages of exhibits were submitted and reviewed.”

Yet the public does not have access to any of these exhibits, the very basis for the findings in this report.

Today, we expect an answer from the city of Joplin on our request for information filed Thursday under Missouri’s open records, open meetings law.

The Globe is asking for a full copy of Loraine’s report, as well as transcripts of the testimony.

We want to know what instructions were given to Loraine as to what and who were to be investigated.

We have asked for a copy of Loraine’s bill to the city for the investigation and information about what city fund will be used to pay for the costs.

We want a copy of the land assemblage contract between the JRC and Wallace Bajjali Development Partners and any payments made to Wallace Bajjali on each land transaction. Finally, we are asking for Rohr’s employment contract or terms of employment.

All of these documents, in our view, belong to the public. Without them, this special investigation has no factual basis for evaluation.

The information belongs to the public and should be placed in its hands.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Sports