The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 20, 2014

Our View: Can you hear me now?

— When last we checked, the Republican Party was the party of local control, of getting government out of people’s lives.

But increasingly we’re seeing Missouri’s Republican-led General Assembly usurping what is properly the business of communities, which is the regulation of what can go where.

A package of five bills that was fast-tracked through the Senate this month and could be out of the House soon would strip local communities of much of their authority to regulate telecommunications companies with regard to the construction, replacement and upgrading of cell towers and wireless antennas.

There would be no local zoning board input, for example, if a company decided to build a cell tower in the middle of a residential neighborhood. There would be no public hearings, nor would there be local council oversight.

According to the Carthage City Council, which sent a letter to the General Assembly protesting the plan, “The industry-written measure envisions no role for the general public, and fails to understand that citizens have a right to basic zoning protections that guarantee accountability.”

Other area cities have joined in the opposition, as have the Missouri Municipal League and the Missouri Public Utility Alliance.

The proliferation of cell towers and wireless antennas is going to be a fact of life. We are going to have to find room for them as we increasingly depend on cellphones and other wireless devices, but we shouldn’t have to sacrifice a voice in where and how these things are built.

State Sen. Brad Lager, a Savannah Republican who is leading the charge on these five bills, said businesses need certainty and consistency when making decisions. But so do housing developers, homeowners and communities.

He also claims that cities are using their zoning and permit processes to hold up telecommunications companies, in some cases even resorting to outright extortion to get these big companies to submit to local needs and agendas, but that seems unlikely.

It’s a good bet that some of these cellular companies have more lawyers on the payroll than some of these concerned communities have residents. Most Missouri towns would be no match for these companies if they attempted the extortion Lager alleges.

These are bad bills. They don’t deserve to go forward.

Let’s just hope legislators are getting the signal.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating