The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


June 24, 2013

Jean Griffith, guest columnist: Watergate scandal holds great lesson for us today

— Little did security guard Frank Wills know that he would change the course of American history.

 During the early morning hours of June 17, 1972, Wills arrested five men in the office of the Democratic National Committee in the Watergate Hotel and office complex.

 Eventually, seven men were cuffed, including former FBI agent G. Gordon Liddy and former CIA operatives E. Howard Hunt and James McCord. The Watergate Seven had planted eavesdropping devices on the phones of the DNC. Soon the FBI assumed responsibility for the investigation. This was the first in a chain of events that would become the greatest scandal in American political history. But to understand Watergate, you first must understand America’s involvement in Vietnam.

Watergate can be traced to the day President Richard M. Nixon gave his daughter Tricia’s hand in marriage in a White House wedding ceremony. On that same day, June 13, 1971, The New York Times published the first installment of a series of sensational front page stories based on a top secret study of America’s military role in Southeast Asia. The Pentagon Papers had been leaked to Times reporter Neil Sheehan by Daniel Ellsberg in February of 1971.

Nixon immediately ordered the Justice Department to seek a court injunction to stop the presses; The Times sought to defend its freedom of the press.

In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. U.S upheld the Times’ right to continue publishing the classified document. Nixon was furious. In the words of aide Charles Colson, the president stated emphatically: “I don’t give a damn how it is done. I want to know who is behind this, and I want the most complete investigation that can be conducted ...whatever the cost.”

Unfortunately for Nixon, it would cost him his presidency.

The motive for the Watergate break-in at DNC headquarters was apparently political espionage, to mine every detail of the Democrats’ strategy and perhaps to uncover information that would discredit the Democratic party. Given Nixon’s poll numbers, the Watergate burglary now seems ludicrous. But secrecy often cultivates a culture of paranoia, and so it was in the Nixon White House.

With a grand jury collecting evidence and a new Watergate revelation appearing on the front pages of the Washington Post daily, by February 1973, the Senate had seen enough. It voted to create the Senate Select Committee to investigate the unethical and illegal conduct during the 1972 presidential campaign. Beginning May 17, 1973, before a television audience the Senate Watergate Committee questioned and cross-examined White House chief-of-staff H.R. Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, former Attorney General John Mitchell, Colson and John Dean. The intense atmosphere and mood in the Senate chamber made palpable by Republican Sen. Howard Baker’s penetrating question, “What did the President know, and when did he know it?”

But the earth-shaking bombshell of them all occurred when Republican minority counsel Fred Thompson questioned presidential aide Alexander Butterfield about the existence of a secret reel-to-reel recording system in the Oval Office. Butterfield confirmed its existence. Sensing the possibility of obtaining valuable evidence, Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, along with the Senate Select Committee, issued subpoenas for the president’s recorded conversations.

Nixon, initially claiming executive privilege, eventually agreed to type and release summaries of the tapes allowing only Mississippi Sen. John Stennis to listen to the recordings and confirm the typed transcripts’ authenticity. Cox would have none of it. On Oct. 20, 1973, Nixon ordered his newly appointed Attorney General Elliot L. Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. Rather than do Nixon’s bidding, Richardson resigned.

The event is known to political historians as the “Saturday Night Massacre” after which Nixon would never regain the confidence of not only the American public but conservative Republicans as well. Now in bunker mode, Nixon replaced Cox with tough Houston attorney Leon Jaworski, who followed in the example of his predecessor in issuing a second subpoena for all the tapes.

It would be the legal struggle for possession of the tapes that would force Nixon to resign.

On July 24, 1974, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled the president must comply with the special prosecutor’s subpoena and turn over the tapes.

Known as “the Smoking Gun,” the tape recorded conversation dated June 23, 1971, just days after the Watergate break-in proved Nixon was guilty of obstruction of justice when he urged Haldeman to order the Central Intelligence Agency to obstruct the FBI’s investigation.

Watergate, in retrospect, is a paean to the freedom of the press and the First Amendment.

It is the bedrock of our civil liberties in a democracy as a free people. Watergate is also a tribute to the system of checks and balances devised by the Founding Fathers. It worked just as they had envisioned it would during the Watergate affair.

Most importantly, the scandal reflects the corrupting influences of political power and mammon, which dwarfed even the corruption of Warren G. Harding.

Nixon would have been wise to have remembered the words of President Harry S. Truman who once said: “I never infringe a traffic rule. I never exercise the prerogatives which I sometimes have of going through red lights. I never exercise the prerogative of taking advantage of my position. I believe, first, that I am a citizen, and that as a citizen I ought to obey the laws first and foremost.”

In Truman’s way of thinking, no man, not even the president of the United States is above the law.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Lone holdout

    Missouri continues to be the only state in the United States that won’t allow a prescription drug database to be established.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Anson Burlingame, guest columnist: Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years

    Does anyone recall the major economic argument during the 2000 presidential campaign between George Bush and Al Gore?

    July 22, 2014

  • Our View: Vote no on Amendment 1

    Proponents of Amendment 1 — the Right to Farm Act — have not made their case. We’ve met with advocates of this amendment to the Missouri constitution and listened to their arguments, but we don’t believe they have adequately answered the central question: Who is it protecting, and from what?

    July 13, 2014

  • Your View: Amendment 5 is deception of the highest order

    Amendment 5, sponsored by Missouri Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, “relating to the right of Missouri citizens to keep and bear arms” provides that “any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny.”

    July 21, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: No time to turn away

    With the shooting down of a commercial airliner over Ukraine and fighting that has now escalated to a ground war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, it would be easy for most U.S. citizens to throw up their hands and turn their backs.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Power to defend

    The Globe’s editorial ‘More guns not the answer’ (July 15) was saturated with classic progressive blather.

    July 21, 2014

  • Your View: Thanks for the generosity

    Generally, all we hear about is the bad news, and obviously, there is plenty available. Our church felt this event worthy of public knowledge.

    July 21, 2014

  • Your View: How to upgrade your business

    Let’s see now. When some folks wish to improve the exterior of their properties and have other taxpayers pay for the improvements, they create a community improvement district.

    July 21, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our view: Street smarts

    If your daily commute has been shortened because you no longer have to wait at 26th Street and Connecticut Avenue for a train to pass, thank your own tax dollars.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Decision fails test

    With the announcement that the State Board of Education has decided not to release individual school test results because of cyberattacks and other problems this spring, educators are scratching their heads, as are taxpayers who footed the bill.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A state lawmaker who is one of two doctors in the Oklahoma Legislature is insisting that unaccompanied immigrant minors being housed at Fort Sill be quarantined. Do you think those kinds of measures should be taken?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City Diplomatic Push Intensifies to End War in Gaza Cat Fans Lap Up Feline Film Festival Michigan Plant's Goal: Flower and Die Veteran Creates Job During High Unemployment