The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 12, 2013

Other Views: Missouri wrestles with issue of unemployment

— Jobs were identified as a necessary component to fight poverty by the featured speaker at a Poverty Summit held Tuesday at Capitol Plaza Hotel in Jefferson City.

Meanwhile, a few blocks away at the Capitol, the cost of continued unemployment was the focus of testimony before the state Senate’s Small Business, Insurance and Industry Committee.

Here is the confounding cycle outlined by state Sen. Mike Kehoe, R-Jefferson City.

The economic downturn in 2008-09 caused unemployment claims to soar.

Missouri is among states that assess businesses to pay those claims. When claims exceed assessments — which occurred in Missouri — the state borrowed money from the federal government to satisfy those claims.

Kehoe reported Missouri now owes nearly $595 million to the federal government, and expects to repay $210 million next month.

The loan is being satisfied by raising the assessment on businesses. The assessment now is $42 per employee and is projected to rise to $63 next year and $84 the year after next.

The alternative is approval of proposed legislation that would reduce unemployment benefits. The bill would reduced payment of jobless benefits from 40 weeks total to 20 weeks from July through December.

Spokesmen for social welfare groups and unions, however, fear the consequences of reducing unemployment benefits.

How do we break this cycle?

That is a question faced by policy-makers, employers, social welfare agencies and others.

A consequence of reducing jobless benefits is increasing the ranks of the impoverished.

A consequence of increasing assessments for employers is reducing resources that otherwise might be used to create jobs.

The government safety net was not designed — and should not serve — as a catch-all.

Prosperity is an answer to poverty.

Policy-makers know that. That’s why their focus remains on economic development and job creation.

The focus is not an insensitivity to the plight of the poor, it is an emphasis on encouraging employment.

— Jefferson City News Tribune

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways
Sports