The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


August 5, 2012

ELECTION LETTERS: Removing the ‘county’ label

I am attempting to ignore some of the comments and complaints between the Jasper County Commission and the Jasper County Sheriff’s Office. It seems to me there is always going to be conflict between those who believe they are doing the right thing for the citizens of the county.

However, recently I was amazed with the commissions’ decision to remove the word “county” from the Jasper County Sheriff’s Office Benevolent Fund, now apparently just the Jasper ****** Sheriff’s Office Benevolent Fund.

I got to thinking about this. Is this to say that the commission has the rights to the word “county”? Was there not a Jasper County prior to the current commission, or possibly before a commission was even established? What about Jasper, can the commission take that word away from the Sheriff’s office also? Actually, I’m sure the name Jasper, along with the word county, was being used before Jasper County was even established.

So, I checked on this and found that, according to Wikipedia, the name Jasper is derived from the Greek work iaspis — spotted or speckled stone. If correct, that would be indicative the word itself was used prior to the current usage in our area.

Again, using the same useful reference, county is derived from the old French term “conté” and could denote a jurisdiction.

It’s a shame that this fund, which has been used for the Shop with a Deputy program, food baskets, coins to support breast cancer awareness and other activities that support and assist those in the county, cannot be embraced by the commission. I would think they would be proud to be associated with it.

I guess it all comes down to control.

With all the other important issues, problems and concerns that are currently ongoing in the world, I would think everyone would be more concerned about those than if the word “county” appears on a particular checking account.

Kevin Mitchell


Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

How do you plan to vote on Missouri's Amendment 5 on the Aug. 5 ballot?

A. For it.
B. Against it.
     View Results
NDN Video
Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways