The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

July 5, 2013

Our View: Cheers, jeers, cheers

— The proposal to place the White River, which flows through Missouri and Arkansas, on the National Blueways recognition program was initially applauded as a win for both the environment and for the tourism industry.

But, like so many things these days, the designation of the 700-plus-mile river swiftly hit rough political waters.

On Wednesday, the Department of the Interior threw up its hands and dropped the river from the new federal program after controversy arose on whether it could lead to new government regulations and even possible land seizures.

The uproar led to a group of Republican U.S. senators and representatives from Missouri and Arkansas — including Sen. Roy Blunt and Rep. Billy Long — both of Springfield — to write a letter to the Interior Department asking that the designation be revoked.

Even backers of the designation said they were worried about the backlash from local and state stakeholders. They were concerned that instead of promoting outdoor recreation, wildlife refuges and other public lands, the rancor might have the opposite effect.

It’s hard to know if the program was really flawed, or if it was rejected systematically because it is part of President Barack Obama’s America’s Great Outdoors Initiative.

The White River would have been the second waterway to be named a National Blueway. The Connecticut River was the first.

Designation includes the entire river as well as its watershed. That was 17.9 million acres for the White River.

But, we’re being told that the story ends on an encouraging note.

The issue of protecting waterways got so much attention that supporters have renewed their intentions of protecting the environment from a local and state level.

We hope that can happen without fears — either real or unfounded — of government intrusion dampening the spirits of the true conservationists among us.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Sports