The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 30, 2013

Our View: Cautious approach correct

— Republicans in Washington continue pushing President Obama to take more aggressive action with regard to Syria, where a two-year-old civil war has killed 70,000 people so far.

Demands for Obama to do something followed revelations that the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, most likely used sarin gas on his own people. Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John McCain of Arizona both argued over the weekend that U.S. failure to intervene in Syria will only embolden Iran and North Korea.

Obama has called the use of chemical weapons his “red line” for action, meaning it will trigger an unspecified American response.

Graham, McCain and others would like see the United States possibly arming rebels and/or establishing a no-fly zone to neutralize Syria’s air defenses.

No one is talking about sending in U.S. troops, but the history of war is the history of escalation. The United States has not found itself immune to this tendency. Every step we take in that region, whether it is increasing military aid or increasing our role as the sky police, is fraught with peril.

The president is right to take a cautious approach for a number of reasons.

Let’s dismiss outright the argument that our failure to intervene in Syria will embolden North Korea and Iran; from everything we have seen, those rogue nations were fully emboldened years ago.

Meanwhile, a weekend story in the New York Times makes it clear that the rebels some people want to arm are far from being U.S. allies. Some have ties to al-Qaida. One has even been declared a terrorist organization by the United States.

“Across Syria, rebel-held areas are dotted with Islamic courts staffed by lawyers and clerics, and by fighting brigades led by extremists. Even the Supreme Military Council, the umbrella rebel organization whose formation the West had hoped would sideline radical groups, is stocked with commanders who want to infuse Islamic law into a future Syrian government,” the Times concluded.

“Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.”

Nowhere, then, is there sufficient justification for any intervention beyond basic humanitarian aid for the refugees and victims of the civil war.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US