The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

May 6, 2013

Other Views: Tread carefully

— With an apparent affliction of short-term memory loss, some lawmakers are increasing the pressure toward the administration of President Barack Obama to confront Syrian President Bashar Assad and his extended conflict with rebels in his country.

As if an eight-year entanglement in Iraq and a 12-year war in Afghanistan isn’t enough, we somehow feel the need to now immerse ourselves into the Syrian conflict with its no-win options.

The most recent pressure comes from “conflicting assessments” from U.S. intelligence agencies that Assad has used chemical weapons in the conflict and has crossed the “red line.”

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the time has come for a plan to show Assad “his barbaric actions will have consequences.” And what would those consequences be? Taking the side of the anti-Assad forces? Launching airstrikes? Sending in troops?

To date, the U.S., European and Arab powers have assisted the loose alliance of rebels — many of whom have ties to Islamic fundamentalists — with nonlethal supplies including body armor and radios. However, Obama has rejected the idea of sending arms to Syrian rebels, worrying those same arms would wind up being used by the Al-Nusra Front and other Islamists against U.S.-friendly countries or U.S. targets themselves.

As recently as 2005, the CIA reported that 30 percent of the weapons meant for the Iraqi Security Force ended up in the hands of insurgents. The Government Accountability Office in 2011 reported the Defense Department is failing to properly track military equipment earmarked for Pakistan and warned that U.S. technology could end up in enemy hands. Earlier reports found that U.S. weapons in Panama, Somalia, Haiti and Bosnia ended up in the hands of our adversaries.

While there are contingency plans for preventing stockpiles of chemical weapons to be used, it would require sending in U.S. troops, which is very risky and has a high degree of uncertainty. Syria has a capable air defense system, so any air campaign conducted by U.S. allies also would be lengthy and risky.

This is not to say the United States should stand idly by. But we all should understand that the choices America has are bad and worse. There is no heroic, save-the-day option available. All that’s left is a concerted resolve of many countries to share in the risk. Or accept the reality that we would immerse ourselves in another foreign conflict.

The Free Press, Mankato, Minn.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Sports