The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

May 6, 2013

Other Views: Tread carefully

— With an apparent affliction of short-term memory loss, some lawmakers are increasing the pressure toward the administration of President Barack Obama to confront Syrian President Bashar Assad and his extended conflict with rebels in his country.

As if an eight-year entanglement in Iraq and a 12-year war in Afghanistan isn’t enough, we somehow feel the need to now immerse ourselves into the Syrian conflict with its no-win options.

The most recent pressure comes from “conflicting assessments” from U.S. intelligence agencies that Assad has used chemical weapons in the conflict and has crossed the “red line.”

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the time has come for a plan to show Assad “his barbaric actions will have consequences.” And what would those consequences be? Taking the side of the anti-Assad forces? Launching airstrikes? Sending in troops?

To date, the U.S., European and Arab powers have assisted the loose alliance of rebels — many of whom have ties to Islamic fundamentalists — with nonlethal supplies including body armor and radios. However, Obama has rejected the idea of sending arms to Syrian rebels, worrying those same arms would wind up being used by the Al-Nusra Front and other Islamists against U.S.-friendly countries or U.S. targets themselves.

As recently as 2005, the CIA reported that 30 percent of the weapons meant for the Iraqi Security Force ended up in the hands of insurgents. The Government Accountability Office in 2011 reported the Defense Department is failing to properly track military equipment earmarked for Pakistan and warned that U.S. technology could end up in enemy hands. Earlier reports found that U.S. weapons in Panama, Somalia, Haiti and Bosnia ended up in the hands of our adversaries.

While there are contingency plans for preventing stockpiles of chemical weapons to be used, it would require sending in U.S. troops, which is very risky and has a high degree of uncertainty. Syria has a capable air defense system, so any air campaign conducted by U.S. allies also would be lengthy and risky.

This is not to say the United States should stand idly by. But we all should understand that the choices America has are bad and worse. There is no heroic, save-the-day option available. All that’s left is a concerted resolve of many countries to share in the risk. Or accept the reality that we would immerse ourselves in another foreign conflict.

The Free Press, Mankato, Minn.

1
Text Only
Opinion
Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Amendment 8 in Missouri proposes a special lottery ticket to help fund state veterans homes. How will you vote?

For it.
Against it.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kerry: No Deal Yet on 7-Day Gaza Truce Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Gaza Residents Mourn Dead Amid Airstrikes Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp Cumberbatch Brings 'Penguins' to Comic-Con Raw: Air Algerie Crash Site in Mali Power to Be Restored After Wash. Wildfire Crashed Air Algerie Plane Found in Mali Israel Mulls Ceasefire Amid Gaza Offensive In Case of Fire, Oxygen Masks for Pets Mobile App Gives Tour of Battle of Atlanta Sites
Sports