The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


May 20, 2013

Kevin Wilson, guest columnist: When fear wins out, so do the terrorists

NEOSHO, Mo. — I’m going to make a bold statement that’s sure to draw a lot of comments, but hear me out before reaching for the keyboard to type a rebuttal.

We have lost the War on Terror. The terrorists have won.

Now, wait a minute, you say. Didn’t we catch the cowards that bombed the Boston Marathon, and in record time? They didn’t even get out of the city before one was dead and the other was in jail. And because of the efforts of a lot of folks, another deadly attack on New York City was averted. Sure sounds to me like we won and they lost, so why would I say such a thing?

Here’s why: We have lost because too many of us are now willing to give up our privacy for our security. In the wake of the bombing, police forces and politicians are pushing for more and more public surveillance to prevent future attacks from occurring.

And they make a very persuasive case. Why wouldn’t we want to use available technology to fight the bad guys — especially since it works so well? And why wouldn’t we want to save lives and stop terrorist attacks from happening in the first place?

I admit I am torn and somewhat conflicted about this whole concept. On one hand, if I’m in public and not doing anything wrong, why should I care if I am under surveillance? But another side of me values my privacy. I shiver thinking about the all-too-real book “1984” by George Orwell. We are rapidly racing toward a society where Big Brother is constantly watching us and taking care of all our needs, and I for one am scared of that prospect.

Now, I have no problem at all with private surveillance cameras and even cameras at government offices. That is absolutely the right of private businesses, and it makes sense if you are conducting business at a government office to expect a higher level of security. What bothers me is that so many officials are now pushing for cameras in all public places and want private cameras to be registered so they can be integrated and used for surveillance by police and other government agencies.

Does anyone else think that this is pushing the limit, or am I alone in my fears? I think that what the police and FBI did in the Boston case was absolutely correct — they used private resources to piece together what happened, and they caught the bad guys. Great job! My problem is in giving any government entity too much power over my daily life. I really don’t want someone watching my every move — even if I’m not doing anything I shouldn’t be doing.

What happens if and when some official decides he wants to cross the line and abuse that power? Such as the IRS targeting conservative groups or the attorney general’s office spying on The Associated Press. Luckily, they got caught, but these scenarios should cause us to pause and consider just how much more control we want to hand over to the government.

Many of you will remember the days of the Cold War and Nikita Khrushchev ’s famous statement: “We (the Soviet Union) will bury you without firing a shot.” He was implying that we would fall on our own and they wouldn’t need to defeat us by military means.

Well, the same scenario is playing out today with the terrorists. True, they have fired plenty of shots, but they can never win a war in the strictest sense. Instead, they have won by making us value our personal security higher than our personal freedoms. We are more afraid of physical harm than we are of losing our liberties.

That’s why I say we have lost the War on Terror. They have done what they set out to do and what no army could ever accomplish — they have put us in a place where we willingly give up at least part of our freedom.

In his first inaugural address, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Eighty years later it appears that fear has won. And a sad day it is — the lives of so many brave American patriots wasted because of fear.

Kevin Wilson, a former state representative, lives in Neosho.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: That's 'b,' as in bloated

    You can spin this two ways. Only about 2.5 percent of the money the federal government spends each year is spent on improper payments, such as overpayments to people receiving government benefits or tax credits for people who don’t qualify.

    July 11, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: Time for special inquiry

    Testifying at a House committee hearing recently, Internal Revenue Services Commissioner John Koskinen did nothing to enlighten Congress or the public about a year-old scandal about whether his agency improperly targeted conservative groups.

    July 10, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Roundabout education

    With an influx of new roundabouts in Joplin, someone needs to promote education on how to drive through one. For instance, what yield means, stay in your lane, slow down, etc.

    July 10, 2014

  • Your View: How tragic

    “Governor vetoes 72-hour wait” was the headline on the front page of the July 3 Globe.

    July 10, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Restore the hall

    To borrow a phrase from a Home Depot commercial: “Let’s start doing.”

    July 9, 2014 1 Photo

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: It's like stepping into the Twilight Zone

    U.S. Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., was visiting the Fort Sill military complex in his home state and decided to visit the illegal immigrant processing center the federal government had recently opened on base.

    July 9, 2014

  • Your View: Who’s to blame?

    Not long ago, Mercy cut area jobs because our Republican legislators have refused Medicaid expansion.

    July 8, 2014

  • Your View: Access to health care

    On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against an Affordable Care Act requirement that employers cover certain contraceptive products at no extra charge, as part of preventive benefits in employee health insurance plans.

    July 8, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Who’s calling the shots?

    If Missouri Farmers Care really does care about the “Right to Farm” amendment on the Aug. 5 ballot, it sure has an odd way of showing it.

    July 8, 2014 1 Photo

  • Darvin Bentlage, guest columnist: Big ag dream wrong for Missouri farmers

    For centuries, we have had the right to farm. On Tuesday, Aug. 5, a proposed constitutional amendment will be on the state ballot that is supposed to give us protection so we can have the “Right to Farm.”

    July 7, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

A study, to be reported on in Sunday’s Globe, recently reviewed the market conditions across the region. Do you think this is a good time to start a business?

     View Results
NDN Video
Joy Fills Streets of Cleveland As LeBron Returns Proposed Bill to Regulate NY Costumed Characters WH: LeBron's Move a 'Powerful Statement' Ana Ortiz on 'Devious Maids' Finale CDC Addresses Lab Safety Problems Texas Shooting Suspect Collapses in Court Death Toll Tops 100 As Israel Offense Continues LeBron James Says He's Returning to Cavaliers Man Flees Police in World Cup Scalping Scheme Robot Writes Jewish Torah Scroll Raw: Israel, Gaza Exchange Rocket Fire More Immigrants Detained Along Rio Grande World Cup Final Pits Argentina Against Germany Police: Prostitute Linked to 2nd Death Thousands Attend NYC Firefighter's Funeral Art of Haitian Machete Fighting Revived Raw: Australia Hosts Annual Beer Can Regatta Mass. Mayor: Families Lost Everything in Fire Fans Dying to Be Near Jazz Greats Robots Gearing Up for Their Own 'World Cup'