The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 1, 2013

Our View: New tax credits suspicious

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — To the extent that they work, we’re all for tax credits, but recent history in Missouri indicates there’s good reason to treat them with suspicion. Many of the dozens of tax credits the state already offers have simply not lived up to the promises that paved the way for their passage.

On Friday, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon signed the first bill to arrive on his desk this legislative session, authorizing $3 million in tax credits for organizations and local governments to bring in big-time amateur sporting events. Republicans in the General Assembly overwhelming favored this bill, too.

Like we said, to the extent they work, we’re in favor of them, but we haven’t been this fearful of anything involving amateur sports since the Missouri Tigers football team decided to go helmet-to-helmet with the teams in the Southeastern Conference.

State Rep. Bill White, R-Joplin, was one of the few Republicans in the House to cast a shadow on the bill,  noting that there were no “carve-outs” for smaller, rural areas.

He called it a “Kansas City and St. Louis tax credit,” meaning they will gobble up the incentives faster than Bill Snyder resurrected the K-State Wildcats football team.

“If we were to ever get any part of that I would be shocked,” White said recently. Even Springfield, he said, wouldn’t stand a chance.

Already, the new incentives will be added to a bid by the St. Louis Sports Commission to lure the Olympic swimming trials in 2016 and the SEC men’s basketball tournament in 2017 or 2018.

Other lawmakers who opposed the bill were right to note that many big-time amateur sporting events already are coming to Kansas City and St. Louis, including major college basketball tournaments, without the use of incentives.

But it’s a done deal now.

We just ask that legislators take a hard look at these incentives again in a couple of years to see if they are doing what is expected. That is, to bring in in new and additional amateur events — not just subsidizing existing events — and that every city in Missouri is sharing in the incentive.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue
Sports