PITTSBURG, Kan. —
“A penny saved is a penny earned.”
Who said that? Benjamin Franklin, the first postmaster general of the United States. Franklin continues to be right. Piggy banks are still a good idea. But to require so many pennies from your operating capital to be deposited in the piggy bank to fund operations 75 years hence is a bit much. So much so that it breaks the back of the United States Postal Service’s ability to regroup and remanage itself, and to adapt to the realities of an Internet world.
There are lots of ways to save money and cut expenses, but cutting Saturday service does not have to be one of them.
To save 2 percent of the post office’s budget by dropping Saturday mail delivery is a bad idea, born of the necessity to cut somewhere, because Congress has punished the postal service by requiring it to fund pensions 75 years in advance, and to do it in 10 years time.
This is so futuristic a ploy that most of the employees who will be protected 75 years from now have not even been born yet. That rather curious requirement has virtually crippled the USPS’ ability to operate efficiently.
They are damned if they do and damned if they don’t because of a mandate imposed upon the institution by a Congress that wants to privatize almost anything governmental, and that seems to value FedEx and UPS over the federal mail delivery system. Congress has set up the postal service to fail by imposing this unprecedented burden on its ability to manage itself. It doesn’t have to be that way. Congress can change it, but there has to be a will to do that, and to let the postal service compete for mail delivery add associated service dollars in a way that does not tie the hands of its management.
It is perhaps no accident that some of the USPS’ biggest congressional critics are Congressmen like Darryl Issa of California, who also just happens to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of political donations by the UPS political action committees, and whose personal investments in entities with substantial amounts of stock in both FedEx and UPS have been called into question. He also happens to be the chairman of the House Congressional Committee overseeing the postal service and in charge of “saving” it from itself. Talk about the fox being appointed to guard the henhouse.
Let me put it another way. A penny spent on a congressman comes back in nickels and quarters to those smart enough to undercut the competition of government in the document and package delivery business. “Show me the money,” as Tom Cruise so famously says in “Jerry McGuire.” It seems very clear that there are many congressmen who, for various reasons, not all of which are altruistic, would be happy to see the end of the postal service as we know it.
With all the hype about the cost of government, and the need for more taxation to support the level of government we have, the postal service stands out as the one exception to the rule. It pays for itself. It does not need taxpayer subsidy, and if left to manage and compete on a level playing field, it would continue to provide a vital service, at no expense to the taxpayers, for many years to come.
The old post office maxim that “neither rain, nor snow, nor dark of night, will keep us from our appointed rounds” need not be the mantra of the modern post office. But “neither chicanery, nor corruption, nor co-opting of essential government functions” shall sideline us from completion of our appointed rounds” is not a bad substitute.
John T. Sullivan Jr. lives in Pittsburg, Kan.
PITTSBURG, Kan. —
“A penny saved is a penny earned.”
Other Views: Kansas gets passing grade
Assigning a midterm grade to the work of Kansas legislators isn’t a simple task.
Our View: Say you're sorry
Here’s a form of punishment we favor: If you break the law, you pay the fine or do the time, but you also have to say you’re sorry.
Your View: Constitutional emergency cord
The federal government is in a real mess. Do you think Washington will take the initiative to “fix” itself?
Your View: Won’t be forgotten
After Monday’s Joplin City Council meeting, Richard was very quiet. I was wound up and talking, and he was quiet.
Your View: What would you do?
Just suppose that you own a house that admittedly needs repair.
Other Views: Not a mandate
Health insurance providers in Missouri have been ducking their obligations to pay for new forms of cancer treatment, those that involve pills and liquid ingestion instead of intravenous drugs.
Your Letters: Curbside recycling issue, City council agendas
Where’s the benefit?
Thank you for the article on the Joplin Chamber of Commerce’s support for curbside recycling (Globe, March 5).
I had forgotten that this issue was to be on the April ballot. I am voting “no.” I am one of those who make regular trips to the Joplin Recycling Center, and I appreciate its hours being extended.
Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Harry Reid taking partisanship too far
Recent columns have highlighted climate change, income inequality and immigration as the three shiny objects the Democrats hope will distract a gullible public between now and the midterm elections.
Our View: Paying the bill
The Joplin City Council, in a 5-4 vote on Monday, decided again to ignore a contract that established guidelines for the investigator hired to look at three ethics questions.
Doug Brooks, guest columnist: Human toll should have prompted Senate to act
Again this year, Republicans in the Missouri Senate voted not to allow Medicaid expansion in Missouri. This is a big deal.
- More Opinion Headlines
- Other Views: Kansas gets passing grade