Actually, perhaps the question is: What is the tea party? As an organization, the tea party has been silent during recent fiscal cliff negotiations.
Either it has no central leadership to articulate a specific political position or its leadership is simply silent as far as solutions are concerned about the looming tax increases and spending cuts come January 2013.
Sure, there are members of Congress, in both the House and the Senate, who are in office today because of tea party support. That support has been decidedly grass roots and not generated by some type of central leadership articulating details of particular political positions to take on given matters.
At best, such a central position would be to limit the size and scope of the federal government and cut spending only to regain American economic prosperity.
In our view, the tea party is truly a parenthetical political party. The sentiments coming from a large number of Americans have so far relied on the GOP as the political party to provide the overall leadership and guidance to achieve goals. But the real leadership in the GOP has been unable to collectively organize within one political party all the sentiments coming from the grass roots of America.
Certainly the success of the Democratic Party in the past election was a result of the GOP’s inability to coalesce the very diverse elements of conservatism into a single and united political party. Instead the calls for reduced size of the federal government were rolled in with a form of evangelical intensity that when viewed together were rejected soundly by the majority of American voters.
Ultimately that is a challenge for both an effective two-party political system as well as the impact of conservative thoughts and actions in how we govern America.
Opinion
Our View: Where's the tea party?
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Safer schools
Being able to see for ourselves what would have happened to our children had they been standing in the main hall of their schools during the May 22, 2011, tornado had a profound effect on our understanding of safe schools.
-
Marilyn Beasley, guest columnist: Claiming responsibility for abuse of power
Over the past few months we’ve witnessed the abuse of power by President Barack Obama and his administration.
-
Our View: ‘Why?’ has no answer
Just hours before, there was breakfast and laughter. There were pictures on the walls and memories in every room.
-
Our View: Absent from House
We can’t figure out why two Missouri legislators think they should be elected to the U.S. House when it appears they can’t seem to show up to take care of business in the Missouri House.
-
Your View: Terrorism is terrorism
In the May 13 issue of The Joplin Globe there was an Associated Press article concerning the New Orleans shooting.
-
Your View: Terrible injustice
I see this Jasper County nuisance law as a terrible injustice on the rights of the residents of Jasper County.
-
Your View: Should we be outraged?
Were there effusive apologies following the lockdown of Boston as most of the continent indulged vicariously in the ongoing manhunt?
-
Phill Brooks, columnist: Missouri Senate did what Founding Fathers had in mind
George Washington once described the Senate as being like a saucer in which you pour coffee or tea.
-
Other Views: Conflicts in SEC
Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want.
-
Our View: Fixing failure
Some 1,200 injured workers will finally get the payments they are owed. In its final week in session, Missouri’s General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed a solution to address the insolvency of the state’s Second Injury Fund.
- More Opinion Headlines
-



