The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


February 20, 2013

Vonnie Corsini, guest columnist: A joy, not a chore

PITTSBURG, Kan. — People who care about charming downtown districts need to be aware of the two bills proposed this past week by the Kansas House committee for local governments.

House Bill 2118 would remove review of the environs of a listed building completely, and House Bill 2089 would allow local governments to opt out of 106 Reviews.

Historic preservation guidelines already have little impact on development projects unless the owner of a listed building is provided tax incentives or grants to restore the structure, or the city chooses to enforce an “impact analysis” in a 106 Review by the State Historic Preservation Office.

House Bill 2118, if passed, would take away the limited protection now offered to some historic structures. The current laws requiring review of environs have a distance of 500 feet from a building listed on the State Historic Register in an incorporated area and 1,000 feet in an unincorporated area. An environs review safeguards heritage charm and historic integrity.

The best safeguards happen at the local level. Cities that receive “certified local government” designation have local historic preservation planning councils that maintain and craft their own preservation plan. Planning what we wish to preserve in our community would be much better than scrambling to manage development decisions as an afterthought of a redevelopment or condemnation process. Decisions need to be guided by professional valuation appraisers trained in historic preservation.

House Bill 2089 proposes to allow local governments to opt out of 106 Reviews entirely. Without the 106 Review at the state level or by a certified local government, rural communities are especially vulnerable because they rarely have organized historic societies or preservation councils.

When they do, the groups are often uninformed and only notified, if ever, as a final detail of a project.

Building appraisals ought not to be made without educated specialists working in cooperation with local governments and developers. The environs law and 106 Review could help rural communities manage their historic assets instead of perpetuating a pattern of complacency and permanent loss of historic resources.

Let’s work with developers to explore alternatives that will preserve the charm and heritage appeal of our existing structures. Our future generations count on today’s leaders to preserve and protect their inheritance. Historic preservation should be a joy, not an unpopular chore.

Vonnie Corsini is the executive director of the Colonial Fox Theatre Foundation in Pittsburg, Kan.

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating