The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


April 15, 2013

Other Views: Food aid reform needed

President Barack Obama’s new budget contains a sensible and long-overdue reform in how the United States distributes food aid to impoverished nations dependent on foreign help.

The White House would require that nearly half of the $1.4 billion it proposes for food aid be spent to buy food locally in the country needing assistance or distributed in the form of vouchers for local purchases.

This plan has several advantages, not the least of which is that it’s cheaper than the current system. Now, the U.S. Agency for International Development buys the food here at U.S. prices and ships it overseas in U.S.-flagged vessels at considerably greater expense than using foreign-flagged ships.

Buying locally would strengthen the agriculture sector of the afflicted country, where farmers often find themselves undercut by U.S. food being given away or, due to the inevitable pilferage, being sold at cheaper prices on the black market.

The USAID estimates that the savings — 30 percent for some commodities — would be enough to feed an additional 4 million children and that the response time to a request for help would be nearly 14 weeks faster.

Studies have almost uniformly found the current system to be wasteful and inefficient. Despite periodic cries for reform, the Eisenhower-era program hasn’t been altered since 1985. The reason is that a formidable alliance of farm-state lawmakers and the agricultural and shipping lobbies likes the current system — of course, because its members benefit the most — and argues that American dollars should be spent in America.

In deference to the influence of these groups, the Obama administration proposes that 55 percent of U.S. food aid be bought in the U.S. and shipped in U.S. vessels. In the current congressional climate of penny-pinching, the Obama proposal at least stands a chance. While not perfect, half a loaf — well, 45 percent — is better than none.

Scripps Howard News Service

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Too many questions on No. 5

    Even though the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” Missouri voters on Aug. 5 are being asked to consider an amendment that restates that freedom and then goes even further.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Beware the wolf

    The wolf (the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other radical animal rights organizations) has conned Little Red Riding Hood (the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, The Joplin Globe editorial staff and, as of last week, the local Democratic leadership).

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Dally for Division 5

    I have known Nate Dally almost my entire life. As we grew up, Nate always had a strong passion and desire to make sure everyone was treated fairly and equally.

    July 31, 2014

  • Your View: Vote ‘no’ on 7

    The Globe has been on my reading list for over 35 years, and during that time the Globe has frequently supported tax increases. Same thing again in the Sunday, July 27, editorial, “‘Yes’ on 7.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: An America transformed

    On Oct. 30, 2008, Barack Obama boldly declared: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    July 30, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Open the primaries

    Missourians will go to the polls in the Aug. 5 primary.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Missouri's sales tax-free weekend begins Friday. Do you plan purchases around this weekend?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Couple Channel Grief Into Soldiers' Retreat WWI Aviation Still Alive at Aerodrome in NY Raw: Rescuers at Taiwan Explosion Scene Raw: Woman Who Faced Death Over Faith in N.H. Clinton Before 9-11: Could Have Killed Bin Laden Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN