The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Opinion

April 18, 2013

Jim Horton, guest columnist: Lack of funding will sidetrack education goals

WEBB CITY, Mo. — As executive director of the Southwest Center for Educational Excellence, a consortium of 45 public school districts, private schools, colleges and universities, I feel it is my duty to share some thoughts on Senate Bill 26, sponsored by Sen. Will Kraus of Lee’s Summit.

This bill has passed by a veto-proof margin of 23-11 in the Missouri Senate. According to the Missouri Division of Budget and Planning, S.B. 26 will result in a reduction of $104 million in the state budget in the next fiscal year and an estimated $664 million reduction in five years. Proponents of the bill indicate the reduction in taxes will result in an improved economic and financial condition throughout the state, resulting in increased revenues that will offset these reductions. My question is, what happens if it does not? And what impact do the revenue reductions have on funding of services in Missouri?

Here are some facts about funding from the Missouri K-12 public schools:

• In 2005, the state Legislature enacted a new foundation formula as the previous formula could not be adequately funded. Despite the enactment of a less expensive formula, funding for Missouri public schools is already $620 million below the required funding level determined by the latest foundation formula.

• Transportation funding has been reduced by close to $70 million since fiscal year 2009.

• The career ladder has been totally eliminated (reduction of $38 million).

• Funding has been drastically reduced for the Regional Professional Development Centers.

• Parents as Teachers funding has been cut by 60 percent since the 2008-09 school year.

Despite these funding cuts, most school districts have made significant gains in test scores in the last five years, but the calls for additional accountability continue to rise. School districts are required to do more with less financial resources. New testing requirements will require districts to make significant upgrades in their technology. Districts are required to spend time and resources implementing new teacher evaluation systems mandated by the state.

The call continues for districts to prepare students to meet the challenges as they enter higher education and the workforce. Chris Nicastro, Missouri commissioner of education, has set a goal for our state to be in the top 10 states in the area of student achievement by the year 2020 — a goal that districts are working toward but cannot achieve without adequate funding by the state. Legislators argue that increased funding does not mean increased student achievement or better schools, but, in my experience as a school superintendent and working with school leaders, districts have made large reductions in expenditures as state funding has been cut. There is only so much cutting you can do without having a significant effect on the quality of education our students receive.

I hope we are not chasing after Kansas for all of the wrong reasons. Reducing taxes can be appealing. I think most people are in favor of lower taxes — but at what cost? I say to legislators: Before you vote to approve Senate Bill 26 or other similar measures, ask yourself how you propose to fill the hole in public school funding or other government services. If we have such a large hole in the budget already, won’t this bill exacerbate the problem? If, as many people suggest, quality public schools are by themselves a strong economic development tool, what kind of a message does continued reduced funding give?

According to information about current legislation, there is a small increase in education funding in next year’s budget. My guess is that will change if S.B. 26 is successful. Legislators must make contingency plans on how to address education funding if this happens. The education of our students is the most important job we have in our society. Please think of that when discussing this bill.

Jim Horton is the executive director of the Southwest Center for Educational Excellence in Webb City.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Our View.jpg Our View: Pledge must be priority

    Mike Seibert, after being elected Joplin’s mayor on Monday, immediately pledged that the city will be operating with transparency.

    April 16, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: Free choice

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) regarding right-to-work seems to assume that if workers are given the choice of joining a union, they won’t join.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Serious drawbacks

    Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) lays out clearly and persuasively the serious drawbacks with so-called right-to-work legislation.

    April 16, 2014

  • Your View: Step aside

    The people of Joplin made it clear they wanted change at City Hall with their decisive votes to replace two council members.

    April 16, 2014

  • Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Government without apology or explanation

    Americans feel closest to their Uncle Sam at this time of year as he extends his hand for his “fair share” to fund his numerous endeavors.

    April 16, 2014

  • Phill Brooks, columnist: Value of outside fiscal experts for government

    Missouri recently lost a man who had been one of the state’s tax leaders of decades past.

    April 15, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Hate hurts us all

    Investigators say Sunday’s shooting of three people — two at a Jewish community center and another at a retirement complex in Overland Park, Kan. — were hate crimes.

    April 15, 2014 1 Photo

  • Other Views Other Views: State’s theatrics

    Conservatives in the Kansas Legislature have taken advantage of a serious problem — inequities in public school funding — to attack teachers and create new problems.

    April 15, 2014 1 Photo

  • Joan Banks, guest columnist: Right-to-work isn’t what’s right for Missouri

    Right-to-work legislation is up in the air right now in the Missouri Legislature.  Last week, the bill failed to get enough votes to advance to the Senate, but supporters are working to get those votes and move it forward.

    April 14, 2014

  • Our View: A hand across

    Have you ever needed $20 to help you get by until payday, a ride to work when your car wouldn’t start or someone responsible to watch your children for a few hours?
    Of course you have, and odds are you picked up the phone and there was someone on the other end willing to help.

    April 13, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Poll

The Supreme Court may take up a challenge to an Ohio law that bars false statements about political candidates during a campaign. Do you think false accusations made in the heat of an election should be punished as a crime?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Facebook
NDN Video
Disbanding Muslim Surveillance Draws Praise Hundreds Missing After South Korean Ferry Sinks Passengers Abuzz After Plane Hits Swarm of Bees Boston Bomb Scare Defendant Appears in Court Pistorius Trial: Adjourned Until May 5 Diaz Gets Physical for New Comedy Raw: Ferry Sinks Off South Korean Coast Town, Victims Remember Texas Blast Freeze Leaves Florida Panhandle With Dead Trees At Boston Marathon, a Chance to Finally Finish Are School Dress Codes Too Strict? Raw: Fatal Ferry Boat Accident Suspicious Bags Found Near Marathon Finish Line Boston Marks the 1st Anniversary of Bombing NYPD Ends Muslim Surveillance Program 8-year-old Boy Gets His Wish: Fly Like Iron Man Sex Offenders Arrested in Slayings of CA Women India's Transgenders Celebrate Historic Ruling Tributes Mark Boston Bombing Anniversary Raw: Kan. Shooting Suspect Faces Judge
Sports