You may not like Wal-Mart - indeed, you may even actively dislike the world's largest retailer - but what the state of Maryland is trying to do in forcing the company to either increase spending on employee health care or pay a similar amount in higher taxes is simply, well, unfair and discriminatory.
The law, which was written so that it applies only to Wal-Mart, is nothing less than extortion.
Creating a tax penalty in order to punish the company for failing or refusing to acquiesce to state-mandated expenditures on health benefits is nonsense. It would set an outrageous precedent for other states if a federal court finds the state law valid.
If the law is upheld, we would be surprised if it isn't gradually expanded to include all larger corporations and eventually smaller companies as the state seeks ways to reduce its growing Medicaid bill. Where would such state mandates for company health-compensation packages end?
Requiring Wal-Mart to provide increased health-care benefits for employees not only could drive up the expense of doing business for the retail giant everywhere, but would force consumers in other states to pay more for the products they buy from the company's Supercenters and stores. That is unfair. The Maryland law should be stricken.
Wrong stand
We believe Republican incumbent U.S. Sen. Jim Talent and Democratic challenger Claire McCaskill are both wrong in giving their support to a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would ban flag burning.
Thankfully, the proposal has died, though we are sure it will be brought up again during another election cycle. Still, there seems a genuine difference in the positions of the two Missouri senatorial candidates.
Sen. Talent has a track record of supporting the flag amendment. He apparently believes that making a federal offense of burning Old Glory would serve as a deterrent. And, according to The Associated Press, he regularly brings up the issue in his appearances around the state.
McCaskill's prepared statement smacked of political opportunism. She says she opposes flag burning and supports the amendment. But then she criticized the GOP-controlled Congress for scheduling a vote on the amendment because the issue "is not even close to a pressing problem in this nation."
We agree with her that flag burning is not a big problem and that the amendment proposal is hardly at the top of the nation's priority list. We also think the amendment is unnecessary, overkill and an invitation for more wackos to use the courts as a forum for what Andy Warhol described as everyone's 15 minutes of fame.
One would think, however, that a genuine supporter of the amendment, as McCaskill suggests she is, would have applauded the prospect of a vote and hoped for its passage.
Opinion
In our view: Wal-Mart attack
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate
US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany
Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords
Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria
Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC
Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion'
5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La.
Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs
Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames
LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal
$25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines
LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens
Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal
Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart
