We will give U.S. Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., the benefit of the doubt that his legislation to dramatically lower the threshold for prosecuting those who leak classified information is well-intentioned.
But the measure goes way too far, and is - quite frankly - inappropriate for a free society.
Under current law, prosecutors must show that someone who leaked classified information did so knowingly and that actual damage to national security did result or could result.
Bond wants to, as he says, "simplify" the law to say that anyone convicted of leaking "classified" material, regardless of whether it harmed or even truly dealt with national security, can be fined and sent to prison for up to three years.
The problem is the definition of "classified." Despite federal sunshine laws, the U.S. government has become a secret-making machine when it comes to disclosing legitimate information to the public. A low-level bureaucrat wielding a "classified" stamp can shut out the citizens, and they do so on a routine basis.
Bond wants to characterize his measure as a response to a President Bush-hating media that has gone on a destructive binge of revealing state secrets to al-Qaida. But the fact is Bond introduced similar legislation in 2000, long before the war on terror.
The public must be allowed to know, in substantial measure, what its government is doing.
Some want to point to the domestic spying program detailed by The New York Times, L.A. Times and other news organizations as evidence that so-called leakers are harming the country. We will vehemently disagree.
First, the domestic spying program was not necessarily a secret, even though it was classified. Second, there is considerable debate whether the program meets constitutional muster (we feel it clearly does not). Third, no one has offered evidence that the stories harmed or would harm national security. Lots of rhetoric, but no evidence.
In fact, months after the newspapers reported domestic spying, British and U.S. intelligence agencies, with the help of Pakistan, broke up a terrorist cell intending to use liquid explosives to blow up airliners.
If the voters are to judge whether their constitutional protections are being violated, they must have adequate information. Sometimes this comes from patriots from within the system who feel strongly the public needs to know what is going on.
No one thinks newspapers, radio or television stations or Internet sites should report troop movements or strategic plans. The occasional wacky Geraldo Rivera-like incidents aside, the media has neither sought nor published this information.
But criminalizing those who reveal "classified" information without even the slim protection of prosecutors having to show that national security was, indeed, at stake is wrong and goes against our core national values.
Opinion
In our view: Bond plan goes too far
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate
US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany
Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords
Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria
Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC
Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion'
5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La.
Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs
Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames
LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal
$25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines
LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens
Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal
Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart
