Editorial
In our view: Preservation battle isn’t over
Incorporating the historic Newtonia battlefields and the Richey Mansion into the National Park Service’s efforts to preserve important Civil War sites had appeared on a fast track after the proposal won approval in the U.S. House in December.
But things have changed in Congress and the plan has been reintroduced by its champion, Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-7th District.
Still, there is reason for confidence and optimism to believe that the Newtonia battlefields will wind up one day being nationally recognized, perhaps folded into the management of the Wilson’s Creek battlefield in Springfield.
On the plus side is the fact last month’s proposal passed with bipartisan support.
Furthermore, a good case can be made on behalf of the historical significance of the battlefields.
The first battle of Newtonia, on Sept. 30, 1862, was the first — or, at least, believed to be — in which American Indian troops, led by Indian officers, met in bloody combat against each other. That alone makes the site historically valuable or, as Kay Hively, who represented the Newtonia Battlefields Protection Association, noted: “... the site best suited to tell the story of Native American participation in the Civil War.”
On Oct. 28, 1864, Gen. Stirling Price’s retreating Confederate troops were attacked by Union cavalry in what was the final engagement between Northern and Southern soldiers in Missouri. It also is recognized as among the last Civil War battles west of the Mississippi.
Part of the battlefields and the Richey Mansion are being protected by the Newtonia Battlefields Protection Association. But federal oversight and assistance are needed for long-term preservation of these unquestionably historic fields of conflict from the encroachment of modern-day expansion. They should be protected by the National Parks Service.
- Editorial
-
-
In our view: The future of Iraq
At least as far as direct, full-scale combat operations, the Iraq war is over. On the international front, Iraq is not a threat to any of its neighbors or others in the international community.
-
In our view: Hal Roper’s map to life
It’s one thing to receive a great honor.
It’s another thing to earn it. -
In our view: Failed tenure
Mark Templeton, director of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, turned in his resignation on Monday and will gone by Wednesday.
-
Voices: County roads
As a Newton County resident, I want to give a hearty “thank you” to the county administration and workers for the wonders performed this spring and summer on our county roads.
-
Voices: Politics as usual?
I can’t help wondering why our governor just spent $86 million on broadband Internet access for “rural” Missouri in the northern 59 counties that include the cities of St. Louis, Jefferson City, Columbia and Kansas City.
-
Voices: No confusion here
In the Aug. 20 issue of the Globe, a lady wrote to complain about the Missouri State Proposition C. Her complaint was that the wording was so confusing that she could not understand it. I believe that her real problem was that she was opposed to its passage.
-
Voices: Too subtle
I fear many missed Pete Peterson’s subtle point with his letter (Globe, Aug. 20) aimed at Mexico and its government’s tacit encouragement of illegal immigration.
-
Other views: Stick with voters’ wishes
Lawmakers should stick with new rules for renewable energy compliance.
Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved a renewable-energy mandate known as Proposition C two years ago. -
Jim Stone, guest columnist: Armed, but not necessarily safe
It is an American mythology that access to a handgun is equivalent to effective self-defense. No other country maintains the persistent attitude that individuals may not be safe unless they own and sometimes carry handguns.
-
In our view: Soldiers paid price of Iraq war
Was America the evil one forcing its imperialistic will upon the peaceful citizens of Iraq resulting in millions of innocent deaths or was she at her best; toppling an evil and repressive dictator and securing freedom for the Iraqi people?
- More Editorial Headlines
-
In our view: The future of Iraq
