The uproar over stem-cell research continues to echo in Missouri. A proposed constitutional amendment that cleared a House health committee the other day would undo the protections for such research that had been put into place by a constitutional amendment last year. The plan should go no further.
Opponents argue that the procedure known as somatic cell nuclear transfer kills life at the earliest stage. But for life to begin, at least as we understand the process, an egg must be fertilized. No fertilized eggs are used.
Also, the 2006 amendment prohibits human cloning.
The procedure that critics want to outlaw uses an egg from a donor of a relative suffering from a specific life-threatening illness, such as cancer, or a spinal-cord injury. The nucleus of the egg would be destroyed and replaced with DNA from the patient and then allowed to grow. Resulting cells would be implanted in the patient with the hope of curing either the illness or regenerating spinal nerves.
The constitutional amendment proposed and approved last year ensures that research and investments in that research and facilities would not be easily short-circuited over the years by legislative foes.
Somatic cell nuclear transfer may or may not bring treatments and cures for some forms of cancer, for Parkinson’s, for nerve repairs or for a long list of terrible debilitating and deadly diseases. Supporters never claimed that it would. The truth is that no one knows. But for thousands of Missourians today and in the years ahead, somatic cell nuclear transfer is about the only glimmer of hope they have.
An economic byproduct of Missouri’s constitutional approval for this stem-cell research is that the state can expect to attract researchers and high-paying research jobs as well as new construction. That is a secondary consideration, but an important economic one.
The real benefit of somatic cell nuclear transfer for Missourians will come with the first cure or effective treatment from the research.
Opinion
In our view: Stop plan to dismantle protections
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-






