By Jim Ellis
Globe guest columnist
I retired in 1998 after 43 rewarding years in the news department at The Joplin Globe. It was my good fortune to serve as editor and then editor emeritus during the last 17 years of my career.
My goal after retirement was pretty simple: Play as much golf as possible and stay out of the way so the fine new team at the paper could do its job with little or no input from me. My days of responsibility at the paper had ended.
It’s hard to remain silent, however, when someone comes along and besmirches the efforts of you and your former colleagues to make the Globe an award-winning publication.
That’s exactly what happened, though, when Ron Hutchison, a former editor at the paper, felt it necessary in a recent column (Globe, April 29) to slap the faces of his former colleagues with criticism of the news operation of 30 years ago.
I do not recall Ron’s reason for leaving the Globe and his career in journalism. Perhaps he wasn’t pleased with our paper or his associates. Maybe he just felt it was time to move on.
I do know this, however; Ron was wrong in his assessment of the Globe produced in the 1970s and earlier. A handful of staff members back then may have taken their responsibilities too lightly, but most were dedicated and proud of their daily effort to provide the best newspaper possible for their readers. Our writers, editors and photographers were as good as any in the business, and they proved it every day.
Ron forgot to mention in his column that the Globe won five first-place Missouri Press Association General Excellence awards during the 1980s and 1990s. That means our paper was judged to be the best in the state in its circulation category for five years.
By Jim Ellis
Other Views: Funding for state’s roads
Missouri is finding there is no good alternative to growing the economy, adding new well-paying jobs and expanding the tax base.
Our View: Pledge must be priority
Mike Seibert, after being elected Joplin’s mayor on Monday, immediately pledged that the city will be operating with transparency.
Your View: Free choice
Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) regarding right-to-work seems to assume that if workers are given the choice of joining a union, they won’t join.
Your View: Serious drawbacks
Joan Banks’ guest column (Globe, April 13) lays out clearly and persuasively the serious drawbacks with so-called right-to-work legislation.
Your View: Step aside
The people of Joplin made it clear they wanted change at City Hall with their decisive votes to replace two council members.
Geoff Caldwell, columnist: Government without apology or explanation
Americans feel closest to their Uncle Sam at this time of year as he extends his hand for his “fair share” to fund his numerous endeavors.
Phill Brooks, columnist: Value of outside fiscal experts for government
Missouri recently lost a man who had been one of the state’s tax leaders of decades past.
Our View: Hate hurts us all
Investigators say Sunday’s shooting of three people — two at a Jewish community center and another at a retirement complex in Overland Park, Kan. — were hate crimes.
Other Views: State’s theatrics
Conservatives in the Kansas Legislature have taken advantage of a serious problem — inequities in public school funding — to attack teachers and create new problems.
Joan Banks, guest columnist: Right-to-work isn’t what’s right for Missouri
Right-to-work legislation is up in the air right now in the Missouri Legislature. Last week, the bill failed to get enough votes to advance to the Senate, but supporters are working to get those votes and move it forward.
- More Opinion Headlines
- Other Views: Funding for state’s roads