Had Southwest Missouri, Southeast Kansas and Northwest Oklahoma seen a modest-sized, off-stream impoundment of between five and 40 acres built in each of those states during the last year or so, we can only wonder just what effect the water retainment efforts might have had on the flooding experienced in Joplin. Not to mention what they would have had on the devastating waters that forced evacuations and destroyed homes and businesses in Miami, Okla.; Coffeyville, Kan.; and neighboring cities.
Certainly the torrential rains that whipsawed the region and left thousands of homes and businesses under water or caked with mud and muck were unexpected and, according to some older residents, were unprecedented in the past five decades.
One thing that strategically placed confinements might have done is to capture a significant amount of the runoff from the 15-plus inches of rain that drenched the region over a few weeks. The lakes or ponds would have filled up and, with careful management of releases, might have mitigated, although perhaps not prevented, the destructive floodwaters.
Such water impoundments could provide reservoirs to serve the Joplin, Miami and Pittsburg, Kan., areas in times of drought. They would permit economic and population growth in the Tri-State Area, and enhance Joplin as the regional hub for retail, medical, industrial and trucking industries.
Several lakes or ponds of, say, five to 15 feet in depth and covering 40 acres or more might meet the water needs of Joplin and the region over the next decade.
Make no mistake, this must be a regional effort.
The alternative to having a series of impoundments serving the corners of three states could be constructing pipelines to Joplin and other communities from Grand Lake in Oklahoma and Table Rock, Stockton and Truman lakes in Missouri. But what would happen in serious drought conditions when everyone needs water and those lakes are being pressured?
Fifty years ago, as we have stated before, a group of civic leaders proposed the building of a lake on Spring River or Shoal Creek. Such an impoundment could have been built, we suspect, for a fraction of what it would cost today. The fact is that the cost won’t get any cheaper.
Building reservoirs near Joplin, Miami and Pittsburg unquestionably would be expensive. Perhaps one big containment near Joplin might suffice. But can the region afford not to do something, given finite water resources and the intensifying pressure put on them by commercial, industrial and residential growth?
Opinion
In our view: Reservoirs make sense
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs
Expert: Removing LA School's Staff 'Appropriate'
Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames
LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal
$25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines
Obama Gives Education Waivers to 10 States
Giffords Aide to Run for Her Seat
LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens
Winter Slamming North Asia, Parts of Europe
Syrian Forces Renew Bombardment of Homs
States, Banks Reach Foreclosure-abuse Settlement
Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal
Raw Video: U.S. Pullout Celebration
Raw Video: Annual Empire State Building Run-Up
Man Killed in Courthouse Shootout
Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
