Editorial
In Our View: Amtrak tough sell
An interesting proposition has been forwarded by the Missouri Department of Transportation, at the behest of Amtrak and Union Pacific, to Missouri legislators: Find the funds to provide $18 million — $10.6 million more than what the state annually donates to underwrite the failing passenger service in Missouri — to help relieve congestion on tracks used by the passenger service and a heavy volume of freight trains.
It would seem that freight trains are clogging the route between Kansas City and St. Louis and, as a result of delays, the number of passengers using Amtrak has fallen by 20,000 to about 116,000. According to an Amtrak spokesman, the passenger rail service has shown an increase in ridership nationwide.
We would suggest that legislators not only give consideration to the Amtrak-Union Pacific-MoDot plan, but also take a long look at whether the state’s taxpayers should continue to subsidize the passenger service.
A few years ago, we would have suggested that Amtrak was it a waste of valuable and limited state resources and should be eliminated from consideration in the state’s budget.
Alas, in view of the high price of gasoline these days and predictions of further increases in the future, we’ve revised that opinion, slightly. If legislators say it’s time to drop subsidizing the passenger service, fine. But pouring more cash into Amtrak will be a tough sell in the General Assembly. If lawmakers want to continue throwing state dollars at keeping Amtrak trains running in this state, they need to ensure that whatever they decide upon will give Missourians the best value for their money.
They also ought to remember that if the use of the passenger service doesn’t rally after any new infusion of tax money, they will be answerable to their constituents, few of whom will ever board an Amtrak train.
- Editorial
-
-
In our view: Qualified for the job?
Voters in Jasper and Newton counties will be making decisions on several key positions on the local level. Among them are the presiding commissioner races in each of the two counties.
-
Voices: Ensuring a safe place
When we think of our community, we want to think that we live in a safe place. This is one reason why people live where they do. On Aug. 3, the city of Neosho will be asking the voters to approve a tax levy that will go to fund city services.
-
Voices: Operate ‘leaner’
How gullible do these local businesses think the citizens of Neosho are?
It is quite all right for these businesses to support an increase in property taxes. While they may state that this increase will affect them, it will, in truth, have very little impact upon them. -
Voices: Integrity and work ethic
I am writing this letter in support of William “Bill” White. He has donated countless hours as past president of the Joplin Swim Team, where I was fortunate to serve on the board of directors with him for the last four years.
-
Voices: Qualified candidate
Aug. 3 is almost here and we in the 129th District have a very important decision to make.
-
Voices: Way of life
Jim Stone’s recent column in The Joplin Globe shares with readers the “need to stop parroting the words of pundits ... to honestly listen to each other ... and pursue a dialogue that actually makes our nation progress.”
-
Voices: Missed opportunities
I see the friends of Gary Nodler are out in force now. Of course, the fact that Gary Nodler has been a state senator all this time is not due to any exceptional ability on his part. Rather, no one bothered to challenge him until his term limits ran out.
-
Voices: Blunt’s election ads
Congressman Roy Blunt’s political ads promise to “clean up” government and reduce spending that has put the United States in debt. They sound like they are for a “new” candidate.
-
Voices: Vote for a fresh face
With the elections drawing near, the ads ramping up, the door bells ringing, the signs are a-flying, and everyone drawing opinions, why would you vote for a fresh face?
-
Editor's note: Campaign letters
The Joplin Globe wants to hear from candidates vying in the Aug. 3 election and their supporters and critics.
- More Editorial Headlines
-
