The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO


March 4, 2008

In our view: We have a right to use petitions

Not everyone likes initiative petitions. For one thing, they bypass the legislative process. For another, they can clutter up an election-day ballot.

But the biggest critics are those who disagree with what might wind up before voters.

The Missouri House has passed legislation that would impose new requirements on people who circulate petitions for signatures and impede the collection of enough signatures to force an issue onto the ballot.

While there have been any number of initiative-petition ballot issues over the years that we thought unnecessary or that we opposed, Missourians have the constitutional right to use the process and, for the most part, it appears to have worked reasonably well.

What the proposed law would accomplish is to require that petition circulators are residents of Missouri, that they can’t be paid based on the number of signatures they collect, they can circulate only one petition issue at a time and must register before they begin the collection of signatures rather than before the deadline for filing the petitions.

Limiting the circulators to Missouri residents is not a bad idea. But the restrictions that they can’t be paid by the number of signatures, that they can’t collect signatures for more than one petition issue at a time and that they must register early clearly are intended to scuttle the initiative-petition process.

The question for Missourians involves the constitutional right to enact laws and approve constitutional amendments that the Legislature has failed to provide.

Essentially, what legislators are telling Missourians is that they shouldn’t interfere so much with the way the lawmakers are doing business. Without the initiative petitions, Missouri might not have riverboat casinos, term limits for legislators, a ban on cockfighting or a stem-cell amendment to encourage research into curing or alleviating a variety of serious diseases and nerve injuries.

We believe that Missourians are smart enough to decide for themselves whether to sign an initiative petition. They also are smart enough to decide on election day whether to vote in favor or against an initiative-petition issue. After all, these are the people who voted legislators into office, aren’t they?

Text Only
  • Our View.jpg Our View: No need for No. 9

    “Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Your View: ‘Right to Farm’ is wrong

    On Aug. 5, voters will be asked to make a decision about Amendment 1.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: No on Amendment 7

    The Missouri Department of Transportation is wanting more money through a three-quarter-cent addition to the sales tax. Consider one example of how it spends your money.

    July 29, 2014

  • Your View: Bad way to get revenue

    I received two fliers through the mail today asking me to vote “yes” on Amendment 7, which would add a three-quarter-cent tax to Missouri’s sales tax to help maintain roads and bridges.

    July 29, 2014

  • Other Views Other Views: Symptom of bad policy

    The Obama administration continues to be surprised and shocked when its policies of good intentions suddenly meet the hard reality of unintended consequences.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Rebecca French Smith, guest columnist: Amendment 1: Farmers are 'boots on the ground'

    Take a moment and ask yourself who was the last person in your family to farm.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View; Makes no sense

    Chess was never my game. It’s too complicated.

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Time value of money

     I was shaking my head along with Anson Burlingame (“Much has changed in U.S. over 14 years,” Globe, July 22), then he offered his readers a chance: “Go ahead — take your pick.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Your View: Boiling a frog

    We voters are now being urged to vote on Aug. 5 for Amendment 7 “to fix our roads, highways and bridges.”

    July 28, 2014

  • Our view: 'Yes' on 7

    Opponents of Amendment 7 say this: “Missouri families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery.”

    July 26, 2014

Local News
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter

Given that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that electronic devices and communications are protected from searches and seizure without a warrant, do you think Missouri needs Amendment 9 added to its constitution?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
NDN Video
Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins