Kenny Hulshof’s plans to put more teeth into CAFO laws if he is elected, his long-range energy plan, his thoughts on higher-education funding and his grip on Missouri’s problems make him the best choice in the Aug. 5 Republican primary.
Hulshof, a U.S. congressman representing Missouri, and Sarah Steelman, Missouri state treasurer, are the leading contenders in the primary.
On the Democratic ballot, Jay Nixon is the clear front-runner.
Hulshof, of Columbia, and Steelman, of Rolla, both came on the scene relatively late in the game following Matt Blunt’s unexpected announcement on Jan. 22 that he would not seek a second term.
Hulshof and Steelman, in separate interviews last week, spoke to members of the Globe’s editorial board and youth editorial board. Our two groups came away with the same conclusion — Hulshof has the better connection with Southwest Missourians.
“Hulshof makes a better impression,” said one member of the youth editorial board. “Much of what he said made an impression on me, where Steelman didn’t. Steelman had the same list of answers for most of the questions.”
The teen’s comments succinctly summed up our thoughts as a group.
*On concentrated animal feeding operations, Hulshof departs from Gov. Blunt’s philosophy. Blunt once told the editorial board that he believed CAFOs should operate under state guidelines. Hulshof said he is a local-control guy and felt that county commissions, even those in counties without planning and zoning, need to be able to impose local controls in the permitting process of factory farms. Steelman seemed caught offguard by the question, but said she would be in favor of a plan fair to both sides.
*Steelman, when asked what she would do about increasing money for higher ed, mentioned making it easier for parents to save money. That makes us wonder about her commitment to state funding of higher ed. Meanwhile, Hulshof said that the state should be obligated to increase funding, because the state imposed tuition caps on universities.
*Hulshof and Steelman are on opposite sides of the ethanol debate. Hulshof believes that using corn for fuel is just the tip of the iceberg for the future. Steelman believes that lifting the 10 percent ethanol mandate would help relieve food prices and prices of feed being paid by livestock farmers.
Neither candidate had a plan for restoring at least some of the cuts to Medicaid made under Blunt’s administration. We think that’s a key issue, particularly for Missouri’s working poor, and that it will likely play a large role in the campaign for the general election.
But in this race, we believe Hulshof is the choice.
Opinion
In Our View: Hulshof clear choice
- Opinion
-
-
Our View: Santorum's Achilles' ear
Rick Santorum knocked everyone for a loop this week, not just with his victory in Missouri but with the landslide size of the thing.
-
Our View: Are school loans next 'debt bomb'?
The late American middle class struggled for decades to keep pace with an American dream slipping from its grasp.
-
Our View: A better way of limit terms
A Missouri House committee on Tuesday endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow lawmakers to serve 16 years in the state Legislature, either the House or the Senate.
-
Your View: Is it our fault?
When did coveting things and money take over character? What happened?
-
Your View: No way to run a school
All throughout the state of Missouri, you’ll hear much discussion about teacher tenure and the indefinite contracts that go along with that. Most — if not nearly all — jobs in the private and public sectors have no such career protection.
-
Your View: Prime suspects
If it’s too cool in the house, you can turn up the heat if you think you can afford it.
-
Our View: Worldwide concern
There is growing concern worldwide that Israel might launch an attack on Iranian nuclear plants.
-
Other Views: FAA deal up in air five years
The Federal Aviation Administration bill was delayed 23 times, but the agency finally has a law giving it $63 billion and full operating authority for the next four years.
-
Don Ray, columnist: Obama's pipeline excuse an election-year cop-out
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama announced he was rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project — a project that had its beginnings some 40 months ago (September 2008).
-
James Whitford, guest columnist: Broken people or broken system?
Are the people broken or is the system broken? If you walk into Watered Gardens, our rescue mission, it may seem the people are broken. But it’s a rescue mission. It just feels that way. And sometimes, it just looks that way.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate
US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany
Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria
Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC
Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion'
Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords
5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La.
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs
Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames
LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal
$25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines
LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens
Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal
Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart
Skip the Coffee Cup and Inhale Your Caffeine Fix
